Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice - a proper satisfaction ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 4, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice - a proper satisfaction has been arrived at before initiation of penalty proceedings, and then a defect in notice including mere non-striking of irrelevant portion in the notice does not invalidate the penalty proceedings.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice - a proper satisfaction ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 4, 2019

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mandation of specification of charge - It is clear that for the AO to assume jurisdiction u/s 271(1)(c), proper notice is necessary and the...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - non specification of charge - Assessing Officer has issued a vague and defective notice under section 274 r.w.s....

Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. It was questioned whether a precise charge was brought against the assessee and if the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - The notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(l)(c) of the Act were issued without striking off the irrelevant portion of the limb...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - AO is under obligation to specify the appropriate limb of clause (c) of section 271(1) at the time of initiation as well as at...

Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - defective notice - it would be too technical and pedantic to take the view that because in the printed notice the inapplicable portion...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Non specification of charge - defective notice - as the A.O had clearly failed to discharge his statutory obligation of fairly putting the...

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessment order, by a fiction of law, is deemed to constitute satisfaction of the Assessing Officer for initiation of penalty proceedings - HC

Quick Updates: