Non-speaking order - It is clear that the order of Tribunal is ...

Tribunal's Non-Speaking Order Fails to Address Appellant's Grounds; Must Discuss Each Ground and Record Arguments Thoroughly.

March 21, 2020

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Non-speaking order - It is clear that the order of Tribunal is certainly a non-speaking order and the Tribunal failed to consider the grounds raised by the appellant. Merely reproduction of comments from the show cause notice or order-in-original is not sufficient for a Tribunal to dismiss the appeal filed by the appellant. Each and every ground raised should be sufficiently discussed by the Tribunal while passing any order, that too, upon recording the rival contentions raised by either parties before it. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Non-speaking order - It is clear that the order of Tribunal is ...

Tribunal's Non-Speaking Order Fails to Address Appellant's Grounds; Must Discuss Each Ground and Record Arguments Thoroughly.

March 21, 2020

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

The Tribunal held that in a case involving a requisition u/s 132A of the Act, the jurisdiction to complete the assessment is governed by the provisions of Section 153A....

Scope of order of the tribunal - The Tribunal has failed to record any reasons with respect to seven out of eight questions raised in the reference applications. It is...

Rectification u/s 254 - ITAT refused to admit additional ground - Having found that the recording of satisfaction by the AO of the searched person is mandatory; which is...

Disallowance of contingency expenses claimed by the assessee. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the contingency expenses despite acknowledging that the total cost...

Non adjudication of grounds by tribunal - Liability of TDS u/s 194C - Tribunal ought to have rendered a finding on the grounds raised by the assessee with regard to the...

Assessee filed second rectification application u/s 254, raising same grounds as first miscellaneous application which was already rejected. Tribunal held that except...

Writ petition against the order of Tribunal refusing to rectify the error which was apparent on record - to that extent the finding recorded by the Tribunal is perverse...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reasons recorded on incorrect assumption of facts and non application of mind - possession of ITS information that the assessee has...

Gift received from relatives - unexplained cash credit u/s 69 - Tribunal found that the assessee had not made out grounds to permit to bring in such additional evidence...

Taxability - supply of tangible goods service - Tribunal set aside the demand - CESTAT has recorded only an abrupt finding without discussing the issue and without...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues in the case. The AO made additions based on uncorroborated documents seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

Rectification u/s 254 - Addition u/s 68 - non-consideration of certain facts in Order of the Tribunal - ignoring the material already on record on the part of the...

The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

Entitlement for refund of input credit in cash, which was neither transitioned in accordance with TRAN-1 (GST) procedure into the new regime nor got reflected in the...

Quick Updates: