CENVAT Credit - inputs and input services used in the power ...

High Court Finds No Substantial Law Questions; Tribunal Allows CENVAT Credit Appeal for Power Plant Inputs and Services.

April 23, 2020

Case Laws Central Excise HC

CENVAT Credit - inputs and input services used in the power plant - The Tribunal while allowing the appeal of the assessee relied upon its own order passed in the case of the very same assessee but Revenue has not thought fit to challenge the order passed by the Tribunal referred to in Paragraph No.4 of the impugned order - No substantial questions of law - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

CENVAT Credit - inputs and input services used in the power ...

High Court Finds No Substantial Law Questions; Tribunal Allows CENVAT Credit Appeal for Power Plant Inputs and Services.

April 23, 2020

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of short-term loss claimed by the assessee in the Profit and Loss Account, holding that the shares were acquired under a normal...

Jurisdiction of civil court u/s 34 of SARFAESI Act was in question. Suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction was rejected by lower courts under Order...

The case pertains to additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of bogus share application money and commission for bogus accommodation entries. The ITAT deleted...

Substantial question of law to be made out u/s 260A or not? - Undisclosed income surrendered during the Search and Seizure action - to be taxed at normal rate or tax...

Addition u/s 68 - substantial question of law - The Supreme court has held that, the jurisdiction of the High Court to interfere with the orders passed by the Courts...

Substantial question of law to be made u/s 260A - prerequisite of admission of the appeal before the High court - The ITAT hold that the assessee had correctly offered...

Seizure of goods as smuggled into the country from Myanmar u/s 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. The burden of proof lies on the respondent u/s 123 to show that the seized...

Revision u/s 263 challenged for lack of proper inquiry by Assessing Officer regarding cash deposits during demonetization, scrap sales, and non-submission of audit...

Validity of the decision High Court deciding the appeal on admission state itself on merit - The Supreme Court observed that while the High Court had framed certain...

CENVAT Credit - input services - outward transportation of goods (GTA Services) - place of removal - period from 2009-10 to 2013-14 - Tribunal observed that, Appellants...

The High Court held that the order u/s 263 made no reference to the issue of depreciation, and the Tribunal had correctly answered the question by stating that the...

Allowabiltry of depreciation - not claimed deprecation in either its original return or in its revised return - Tribunal allowed the depreciation - no substantial...

The HC dismissed the appeal, holding that no substantial question of law arose from the ITAT's order. The ITAT had allowed the assessee's claim for benefits u/ss 11 and...

Penalty u/s 271C -LTA - Mere admission of the appeal by the High Court on the substantial questions of law as have been quoted above, would make it apparent that the...

Quick Updates: