Penalty levied u/s 271(I)(c) - Whether "Mens rea" is apparent in ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 29, 2020

Penalty levied u/s 271(I)(c) - Whether "Mens rea" is apparent in this case? - where the two regular appellate authorities have granted the relief to the Assessee by deleting the penalty imposed by the Assessing Authority u/s 271(1)(c), we don't think that it is a fit case for re-imposition thereof, by allowing the appeal of the Department - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty levied u/s 271(I)(c) - Whether "Mens rea" is apparent in ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 29, 2020

You may also like:

Levy of penalty - mens rea in evasion of tax - It is well settled that by merely using the expression “mens rea”, it would not amount to concluding that there was a...

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Default by assessee - mens rea is not an essential element for imposing penalty for non compliance of notices issued by AO - penalty confirmed - AT

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Levy of penalty under Section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - C-Forms - inter-state sales - the essential ingredient of mens rea for levy of penalty on the...

Levy of penalty - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - existence of mens rea or not The High Court referenced a specific case and highlighted that the issue of...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) or penalty u/s.271AAA - The provisions of Section 271AAA(3) of the Act specifically excludes the provisions of Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the...

If there is no mens rea, no mandatory penalty u/s 11AC - SC

Notice u/s 271AAB to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO gets the jurisdiction to levy the penalty by issuing a notice and therefore, it is not a procedural requirement but...

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(2) of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 - men-rea - The Court concluded that mens rea is indeed an essential prerequisite for imposing a penalty under...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - mistake of non-initiation or incorrect initiation of penalty - the inherent indication u/s 271(1) makes it clear that the Pr. CIT / CIT does...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - Penalty has been levied in a mechanical manner without application of mind. In our view, this is a serious mistake in the...

Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - Income disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income which is not part of Regular Accounts - CIT(A) directed the AO that levy penalty...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

Quick Updates: