Levy of penalty - Profiteering - purchase of flat - It is ...

Case Laws GST

August 18, 2020

Levy of penalty - Profiteering - purchase of flat - It is apparent from the perusal of Section 122 (1) (i) that the violation of the provisions of Section 171 (1) is not covered under it as it does not provide penalty for not passing on the benefits of tax reduction and ITC. It only provides for imposition of penalty for not issuing an invoice or for issuing an incorrect or false invoice in respect of any supply of goods or services or both - Since, the profiteered amount is not a tax imposed under the CGST Act, 2017, No penalty - NAPA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty - Profiteering - purchase of flat - It is ...

Case Laws GST

August 18, 2020

You may also like:

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Profiteering - supply of construction services related to the purchase of Flat - where the project was launched after introduction of GST, booking/price of the flat has...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Profiteering - purchase of a Flat/supply of construction service - The Respondent has denied the benefit of ITC to the buyers of his flats/shops/units in contravention...

Profiteering - service of construction of affordable housing provided by the Respondent - benefit of reduced ITC not passed on by commensurate reduction in the price -...

Profiteering - purchase of flats - benefit of Input Tax Credit had not been passed on to the Applicant - The Authority determined amount of Rs. 85,77,419/- (including...

Profiteering - supply of purchase of Flat - it is established that there had been no additional benefit of ITC to the Respondent and hence he was not required to pass on...

Profiteering - purchase of flats - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the commensurate benefit of ITC to him - post-GST, the Respondent has been...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - The respondent has denied benefit of ITC to the buyers of the flats being constructed by him in the project in contravention of section...

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - The Authority finds no reason to differ from the detailed computation of profiteered amount by the DGAP or the methodology adopted by...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Quick Updates: