Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - set off of business loss against income ...

No Penalty Imposed for Good Faith Claim on Business Loss Set-Off u/s 271(1)(c.

October 16, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - set off of business loss against income from other sources disallowed - Claim of the assessee is in consideration of the financial statements and the assessee adopted one of the possible views that the business loss can be set off against the income from other sources. The assessee has made a claim under the bonafide belief that it is allowable under the law. - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - set off of business loss against income ...

No Penalty Imposed for Good Faith Claim on Business Loss Set-Off u/s 271(1)(c.

October 16, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

Disallowance of setting off of the carried forward loss - return filed beyond the due date specified under subsection (1) of section 139 - It was argued that the delay...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Set off of brought forward business loss - mistakes in previous years for not claiming benefit of set-off - 8 years time limit provided in the statute - The ITAT found...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - wrong claim of set off loss - explanation was not found false - no iota of evidence of concealment of any fact relating to particulars of income...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Addition u/s 43(5) - Loss in commodity derivatives trading business was non-speculative - Reading clause (e) of the first proviso to section 43(5), and sections 70(1)...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for excess deduction claimed u/s 10B. The assessee furnished all relevant facts for computing total income, and provided detailed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim of deduction under Section 35CCA - penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was rightly imposed - HC

To impose penalty u/s 271(1)(c), willful concealment is not an essential ingredient - HC

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for disallowance of depreciation. The ITAT held that the assessee did not deliberately claim depreciation with an...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Transfer Pricing adjustment made - applying the analysis of the term ‘good faith’ and ‘due diligence’ we are of the considered view that in the...

Exemption u/s 10B - 100% EOU - there was a loss in the Unit eligible for deduction u/s. 10B and there was a business income in an another Unit. Therefore, while...

Quick Updates: