Stay of liquidation application - the legislature has ...

No Grounds to Challenge Financial Creditors' Decisions in Liquidation; 90-Day Revival Proposal Period per IBC and Companies Act.

December 2, 2020

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tri

Stay of liquidation application - the legislature has consciously not provided any ground to challenge the "commercial wisdom" of the individual financial creditor or their collective decision before the Adjudicating Authority - Needless to say, that even during the Liquidation process, subject to Section 29A of the IBC, 2016 and as per Regulation 2B of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016, a 90 day time period is provided to the Applicant to submit a Scheme as contemplated under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013, and if the Applicant is otherwise found eligible can very well submit a Scheme for the revival of the Corporate Debtor. - Tri

View Source

← Previous Next →

Stay of liquidation application - the legislature has ...

No Grounds to Challenge Financial Creditors' Decisions in Liquidation; 90-Day Revival Proposal Period per IBC and Companies Act.

December 2, 2020

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tri

You may also like:

The Committee of Creditors (CoC) with 100% vote share can directly proceed for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor without taking steps for resolution, as the power...

Extension of CIRP period for a further period of 90 day - the intention of the Committee of Creditors to invite fresh Expression of Interest to enable more bonafide...

Section 53(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) provides for the order of priority in the distribution of liquidation assets. Financial debts owed to unsecured...

Interpretation of Regulation 21A of IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 regarding secured creditor's obligation to realize security interest within stipulated...

Liability to contribute towards Liquidation Process Costs - scope of Financial Institution - The Tribunal found that the appellant, having invested a significant sum by...

Delay in implementation of approved Resolution Plan - In the present case, the Approved Resolution Plan has been alleged to be contravened by the Successful Resolution...

Challenge to an approved Resolution Plan where no consideration was given to payment to an Operational Creditor. The key points are: Section 30(2)(b) mandates that...

NCLAT dismissed appeal concerning liquidator's fee payment under IBC 2016. Secured creditor (Bank) opted to realize security interest under SARFAESI Act without...

Corporate insolvency process - Power of Board to decide amount is to be paid to the ‘Financial Creditor’ or ‘Operational Creditor’ including the liquidation value - SC...

Liquidation of Corporate debtor - time limitation - exclusion of time taken by Tribunal to decide to how the voting share of thousands of Allottees will be counted - the...

CIRP process - We are not convinced with the argument that amended Sub-Section (4) of Section 30 requires only Secured Financial Creditors to contribute towards interim...

Disqualification of a director of the financial creditor to sign the Section 7 application was challenged. The application u/s 7, signed by the director of the financial...

The Appellant, a related party unsecured financial creditor, challenged the resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the Adjudicating Authority,...

The Appellate Tribunal affirmed the decision to exclude the Appellant and other unsecured Financial Creditors from the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The key issues were...

CIRP proceedings - Financial Creditors - Related party - while the default rule under the first proviso to Section 21(2) is that only those financial creditors that are...

Quick Updates: