Refund of the amounts paid during investigation - remittances ...

Court Orders Refund of Rs. 2 Crores to Petitioner After GST Liability Retraction u/s 74(5) of GST Act.

April 9, 2021

Case Laws GST HC

Refund of the amounts paid during investigation - remittances made by the petitioner during investigation - self- ascertainment - Section 74(5) of GST Act - statement recorded at the time of search admitting GST liability and setting the scheme of instalments have been retracted by the petitioner on 05.11.2019 and the petitioner has consistently and vehemently been contested the liability to tax. With this, the requirement of ‘ascertainment’ under Section 74(5), fails. - The mandamus as sought for by the petitioner is granted. The amount of ₹ 2.00 crores collected shall be refunded to the petitioner within a period of four (4) weeks from today. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of the amounts paid during investigation - remittances ...

Court Orders Refund of Rs. 2 Crores to Petitioner After GST Liability Retraction u/s 74(5) of GST Act.

April 9, 2021

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Petitioner sought regular bail in case involving alleged wrongful Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed using fictitious invoices from non-existent/suspicious firms. As per...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund application for unutilized input tax credit. The court held that the...

Refund claim u/s 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 read with Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1994 was partially allowed. Refund of Rs. 20,52,143/- and Rs. 2,19,004/- granted,...

Validity of Service of notice u/s 74(5) instead of u/s 74(1) of CGST / UPGST Act, 2017 - Non-payment of Tax / GST - The High Court observed that while a notice was...

Refund of GST paid deposited by the Vendor on advance paid by the appellant since no supply was made - Return/refund of the entire advance amount - The High Court found...

The High Court dealt with the maintainability of a petition concerning the non-constitution of an Appellate Tribunal and the jurisdiction and authority of the Assistant...

Refund claim for service tax paid on ocean freight not barred by time limitation. Section 11B(5)(B)(ec) of Central Excise Act, 1994 made applicable to Finance Act, 1994...

The High Court considered the issuance of notice u/s 74(1), 122(2), and 125 of the CGST Act, 2017 u/s Rule 142(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 for unpaid tax on Reverse...

The Court rejected the petitioner's challenge to the show cause notice (SCN) issued u/s 74 of the CGST Act on jurisdictional grounds. The petitioner failed to submit a...

Seeking to allow petitioner to adjust the credit amount which was blocked - Demand u/s 74(5) - in the notice dated 01.11.2021, it is wrongly mentioned as Form GST...

Ex-parte order - Quantification of Liability - intention of evade GST - improper accounting of goods - The High court agrees with the petitioner's contention regarding...

Provisional orders of attachment issued u/s 83 can be challenged by filing objection u/r 159(5). Petitioner did not file objection. Respondents issued fresh provisional...

Transitional credit of input tax available under VAT Act sought. State contended refund application pursuant to Annexure-P/15 required. Court held refund of Rs....

Conviction u/ss 420, 467, 468, 120B of the IPC and Section 5(2) and 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Petitioner worked as Appraiser in Customs office....

Quick Updates: