Validity of 158BD proceedings - prior to 04.09.1997, i.e., the ...

Section 158BD Proceedings Invalid for Lack of Jurisdictional Basis; Actions Quashed Due to Missing Seized Materials.

July 10, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Validity of 158BD proceedings - prior to 04.09.1997, i.e., the date on which jurisdiction u/s 158BD was assumed, the books of account were not handed over to the assessee. - Since the AO in the instant case has taken recourse to section 158BD before receipt of the seized material, therefore, the 158BD jurisdictional conditions cannot be said to have been met. Therefore, the entire proceedings u/s 158BD/143(3) are vitiated and, therefore, such 158BD proceedings which are not in accordance with the law are quashed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of 158BD proceedings - prior to 04.09.1997, i.e., the ...

Section 158BD Proceedings Invalid for Lack of Jurisdictional Basis; Actions Quashed Due to Missing Seized Materials.

July 10, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

HC ruled penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E require explicit satisfaction to be recorded by Assessing Officer during reassessment. Mere recording of...

The HC quashed reassessment proceedings for AY 2016-17 initiated via notice u/s 148 issued on July 29, 2022. The Court found that since the reassessment action commenced...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

Dishonour of Cheque - Effect of arbitration proceedings - The High Court referred to a Supreme Court judgment which clarified that arbitration proceedings and...

The NCLAT held that Section 238 of the IBC gives overriding effect to proceedings u/s 7, despite Section 10 of CPC. Proceedings u/s 7 must proceed, as the Code's...

Assessment u/s 158BC / 158BD - No satisfaction note has been recorded on the date of issue of notice under section 158BD - The satisfaction note supplied to the assessee...

Section 143(2) is a mandatory requirement, and failure to comply with it renders the reassessment proceedings invalid. The High Court has consistently held that Section...

Faceless assessment regime mandated u/s 151A - Jurisdictional Assessing Officer not permitted to issue notice u/s 148, as it would breach Section 151A provisions - No...

ITAT quashed notice under section 148 and subsequent proceedings initiated by ACIT Circle-1, Jaipur due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. The assessee's case fell...

The ITAT held that the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 were beyond the 10-year limitation period u/s 153C read with Explanation-1 to section 153A. Hence,...

The court held that Section 6(2)(b) of the Act treats the empowered officers under the SGST/UGST Act at the central level to be at par and does not prescribe for...

The ITAT held that the assessment order under section 143(3) was invalid due to jurisdictional defects. The initial notice under section 143(2) was issued by ITO,...

Validity of reopening of assessment - The case involved a dispute over the deletion of addition on account of undisclosed capital gain and the validity of the assessment...

Section 271(1)(c) penalty was held invalid due to improper issuance of notice, as no proceedings were pending when the notice was issued on 19.12.2019. Section 271A...

Block Assessment - Requirement to record the satisfaction – Proceeding u/s 153A & 153C versus 158BC, 158BD - The provisions of Section 158BD are pari materia with the...

Quick Updates: