Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of 20% on account of bogus ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 4, 2021

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of 20% on account of bogus purchases - Monetary limit for filing appeal - The revenue has tried to make out a case that since the addition was made pursuant to information from sales tax department, this penalty appeal falls in the exception carved out in the CBDT circular regarding appeals arising out of additions made pursuant to information from outside agencies. - Argument of the revenue rejected - we uphold the order's of Ld CIT(A) and delete the levy of penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of 20% on account of bogus ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 4, 2021

You may also like:

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Estimation of income on bogus purchases - Once the quantitative details of purchases and the corresponding quantitative sales have not been...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance of interest expenditure under section 43B as well as disallowance export product development expenses - Just because the assessee...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim of deduction under Section 35CCA - penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was rightly imposed - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Bogus purchases - no clinching material had been brought on record by the revenue which could disprove the authenticity of the purchases claimed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Bogus purchases - we are of a strong conviction that in the absence of documentary evidence supporting the genuineness of the purchases claimed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus purchases - No clinching material had been brought on record by the revenue which could disprove the authenticity of the purchases claimed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Addition of bogus purchases - Tribunal in quantum proceedings reduced to 12.5% of such purchases - since income has been estimated by applying a...

Quick Updates: