Refund of cash amount deposited in PLA account - time limitation ...

Entitled to Cash Refund from PLA Account Under GST Act; One-Year Time Limit Not Applicable Per Section 142(3.

August 17, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Refund of cash amount deposited in PLA account - time limitation of period of one year - on 1st July, 2017 the new Act of Goods and Service Tax Act (GST) was rolled down. Section 142 (3) of the said Act permits the refund of any amount other than duty, tax, interest or Cenvat Credit has to be paid to the assessee in cash - the amount in question was appellant’s own money and he was fully entitled to get the refund of the same that too in cash. This amount cannot been made subjected to any other appropriation. Nor the time limit under Section 11B of CEA can be invoked when such money is sought to be refunded. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of cash amount deposited in PLA account - time limitation ...

Entitled to Cash Refund from PLA Account Under GST Act; One-Year Time Limit Not Applicable Per Section 142(3.

August 17, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

Addition u/s 40A(3) - cash payment in excess of prescribed limit - Genuineness or otherwise of payment is not a criteria to exclude cash payment in excess of prescribed...

Denial of refund claim - Bar of limitation - Whether the time limit of one year has provided under Section 11B is applicable for refund under Rule 5 - Held Yes - time...

Disallowance of freight expenditure u/s 40A(3) paid in Cash - As enhanced limit of ₹ 35,000/- is applicable for the payment to the transport operators and in other...

Refund claim for service tax paid on ocean freight not barred by time limitation. Section 11B(5)(B)(ec) of Central Excise Act, 1994 made applicable to Finance Act, 1994...

HC found the refund claim for unutilized input tax credit time-barred u/s 54. The court interpreted Section 54(1) and 54(3) to establish that while refund claims can be...

The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are:...

Refund Claim u/s 104 of the Finance Act, 2017 - retrospective exemption - The time-limit prescribed u/s 104 (3) is only directory, but however, the time as well as the...

Refund of Service tax - retrospective exemption - The time-limit prescribed u/s 104 (3) is only directory, but however, the time as well as the procedure prescribed u/s...

The assessee's unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were deleted by the CIT(A) after accepting the submissions that the cash receipts from various sources like cash sales,...

Cash Refund of Customs Duty / CVD - appellant could not avail the Cenat Credit - Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 - The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants,...

Refund of amount deposited as pre-deposit - It stands clear that appellant is entitled for refund of ₹ 15 Lakhs as were paid in cash by him at the time of the...

Limit limit to pass order u/s. 201(1)/201(1A) - default for non-deduction of tax at source (TDS) - A subsequent amendment to the provision cannot give a new lease of...

Refund of accumulated CENVAT credit paid towards Service Tax on Reverse Charge Mechanism during April 2016 to June 2017 period is admissible in cash u/s 142(3) after the...

Time Limitation - Refund of unutilized PLA balance - undisputedly the PLA balance for which refund is sought for is out of advance deposit made by the appellant in PLA...

Quick Updates: