Nature of income - Since the assessee admittedly offered the ...

CIT(A) wrongly supports AO's decision to classify declared income as unexplained cash credit u/ss 68 or 69.

February 2, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Nature of income - Since the assessee admittedly offered the income in his return pursuant to notice u/s 148 of the Act, which has been accepted by the AO as such, in my considered opinion, the ld. CIT(A) was not justified in countenancing the action of AO in treating additional income as unexplained cash credit or unexplained investment attracting sections 68 or 69 of the Act and consequently charging higher rate of taxation. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Nature of income - Since the assessee admittedly offered the ...

CIT(A) wrongly supports AO's decision to classify declared income as unexplained cash credit u/ss 68 or 69.

February 2, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Assessee engaged in business of commission agent (Aadatia) for agricultural products. AO made addition u/s 68 treating entire cash deposits in bank account as...

CIT(A) deleted addition on unaccounted business income, accepting assessee's retraction of statement recorded u/s 132(4). CIT(A) agreed cash payment of 60 crores by...

Deposits by the assessee in bank account during demonetization period were not unexplained. Section 69A is inapplicable as there were proper entries for cash sales, cash...

Cash deposit during demonetization period treated as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - CIT(A) sustained addition u/s 69A based on lack of supporting evidence for cash...

Assessee declared cash deposit of Rs. 42 lacs during demonetization period as income. AO made another addition u/s 69A for same amount, treating it as unexplained money...

Assessee purchased credit cards using unexplained cash payments. AO made addition u/s 69A as assessee failed to explain source of cash. CIT(A) confirmed addition since...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 due to the assessee providing bogus accommodation loss entries. The AO had reasons to believe in the...

Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained cash credit - CIT(A) accepted the source of cash deposits without any supporting documents, the issue require detailed enquiry with regard...

The ITAT Bangalore, in a case involving unexplained money u/s. 69A, addressed deposits in a bank account during the demonetisation period. The DR argued that the...

The case pertains to the addition of undisclosed income u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act, wherein the peak credit method was applied. The Commissioner of Income Tax...

Assessee voluntarily declared income under "income from other sources" in return. AO disallowed deduction claimed for coordination and settlement expenses due to lack of...

Unexplained investments - assessee had declared income u/s 44AD - AO has not considered the opening cash and bank balances and only the profits declared is considered as...

Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries regarding cash deposits during demonetization period, called for details from assessee to substantiate source. AO applied mind,...

The ITAT Delhi held that the CIT(A) erred in presuming all cash deposits as business receipts u/s 44AD. The CIT(A) treated deposits as business receipts and applied 8%...

The assessee received cash credits which were treated as unexplained income u/s 68 by the Assessing Officer (AO). However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...

Quick Updates: