Refund of ITC - claim of the petitioner rejected - since there ...

Court Finds ITC Refund Rejection Invalid Due to Lack of Prior Notice; Approves Article 226 Consideration Despite Delay.

February 23, 2022

Case Laws GST HC

Refund of ITC - claim of the petitioner rejected - since there has been no notice issued to the petitioner before passing the order of rejection with regard to the refund either in full or in part, this Court has no hesitation to hold that, the impugned orders insofar as the rejected portion i.e., inadmissible portion of the refund claim made by the petitioner are infirm and vitiated - since the blatant violation of principles of natural justice and also the statutory mandate as contemplated under the Rule referred, these kind of cases are entertainable before this Court by invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India and in these cases, the two years period cannot be construed as a long delay to invoke the doctrine of latches to reject the claim of the petitioner as canvassed by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of ITC - claim of the petitioner rejected - since there ...

Court Finds ITC Refund Rejection Invalid Due to Lack of Prior Notice; Approves Article 226 Consideration Despite Delay.

February 23, 2022

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment under old regime - scope of new regime - scope of TOLA - In this detailed judgement, the Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 was...

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

Recovery of dues by adjusting them against the refund amount - Delay in processing refund - In this case, the default notices were issued after the period within which...

Refund of GST paid deposited by the Vendor on advance paid by the appellant since no supply was made - Return/refund of the entire advance amount - The High Court found...

The High Court held that the reopening notice issued u/s 148 against a non-existent entity, i.e., the amalgamating company that had ceased to exist due to an approved...

The judgment addresses the applicability of Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) concerning the recovery of tax dues from the successful resolution...

The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

The High Court held that the revisional authority's order placing the refund sanction order in abeyance u/s 108 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was...

The circular addresses the entitlement of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by insurance companies on repair expenses for motor vehicles in reimbursement mode of claim settlement....

Refund claim - Period of limitation - Double Taxation - The respondent had also paid tax on the same invoices. - The petitioner sought direction for the refund of Input...

Notices issued u/s 148 by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) were held invalid due to lack of jurisdiction, as per Section 151A...

The appellants challenged the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) denying eligible interest on the refunded amount. The court held that interest accrued on the deposited...

The High Court address the rejection of revision petition u/s 264 due to an inadvertent error in filing Form ITR-VII, resulting in denial of exemption to a trust...

The High Court held that the Execution Application filed by the Applicant against the Respondent does not survive due to the approved Resolution Plan under the...

Quick Updates: