Addition u/s 94A - transactions with persons located in notified ...

CIT(A) Must Re-examine Sham Transactions u/s 94A Despite Initial Dismissal of Additions.

March 3, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition u/s 94A - transactions with persons located in notified jurisdictional area - We note with the able assistance of both the parties that the CIT(A) has nowhere dealt with the Assessing Officer’s detailed discussion holding the impugned “CCDs” to be a sham transaction whilst deleting the additions in issue made u/s 94A of the Act. - The assessee’s plea before us is that this entire “sham transactions” issue has become redundant once the CIT(A) holds section 94A itself as not applicable. Be that as it may, we deem it appropriate that the CIT(A) needs to examine and adjudicate the above stated “sham transactions” issue. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 94A - transactions with persons located in notified ...

CIT(A) Must Re-examine Sham Transactions u/s 94A Despite Initial Dismissal of Additions.

March 3, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - Bogus LTCG - The Tribunal examined the transactions and found that the entire addition made by the Assessing Officer was based on...

Addition u/s 68 as accommodation entries - long term capital gain on sale of shares as sham/bogus transaction - Mere suspicion cannot be a ground for treating the...

Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

Protective addition made by Assessing Officer was not sustainable as substantive addition did not survive in concluded assessment proceedings of related party. CIT(A)...

Additions u/s 69C - CIT(A) contended that the purchases are duly recorded in the books supported by invoices therefore Section 69C do not apply - power of the CIT(A) are...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - addition u/s 40A ignored by AO - expenses have been incurred in cash exceeding Rs. 20,000/- per day - AO is expected to examine the provisions...

Addition on account of diversion of income - The assessee is a simple dealer in grains and obviously does not have any big brand name of his own but simply purchasing...

In this case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding long-term capital gains (LTCG) from share...

Addition u/s 68 – Genuineness of transaction in shares - genuine or sham and bogus – Revenue in failing to discharge the basic onus - inquiry was not carried forward -...

The assessee entered into an agreement for sale and made substantial payment for a property in the assessment year (AY) 2013-14. The Assessing Officer (AO) was not...

Assessment u/s 153A - Unexplained investment in hotel construction rejected as the material found during search pertained to another person, not the assessee. CIT(A) had...

Section 69A addition for unexplained income treated as advances was rightly deleted as the loan amounts were recorded in books, supported by bank statements and...

CIT(A) did not violate Rule 46A by admitting evidence not produced before AO, as Rule 46(4) permits Appellate Authority to call for evidence. CIT(A) rightly deleted...

Addition u/s 68 - bogus share transactions - as alleged transactions in shares, “penny stock” are fraudulent and accommodation entries - The Appellate Tribunal noted...

Jurisdictional issue regarding notice u/s 143(2) was addressed, with ITAT holding that the initial notice by ACIT, Circle-5(1), Delhi was within time, and subsequent...

Quick Updates: