Benefit of exemption - It is evident that the appellant seeks ...

Appellant's New Facts Rejected; No Challenge to LA's Original Ruling on Entries 69 and 70 Exemption Claim.

April 27, 2022

Case Laws GST AAAR

Benefit of exemption - It is evident that the appellant seeks ruling on a different set of facts which were not put forth before the LA. The appellant has not contested the basis of the ruling extended by LA and accepts that after receipt of the ruling by the LA, they have been now guided and rightly so that they are not to be required on the application of Entry 9C, which is a new ground not examined by the LA and therefore this forum cannot adduce any ruling on the same. The appellant has not contested the applicability of the entries 69 & 70 of the Notification, on the support of which, they had claimed exemption for registration before the LA. - AAAR

View Source

← Previous Next →

Benefit of exemption - It is evident that the appellant seeks ...

Appellant's New Facts Rejected; No Challenge to LA's Original Ruling on Entries 69 and 70 Exemption Claim.

April 27, 2022

Case Laws GST AAAR

You may also like:

Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by original authority on grounds of ineligibility for exemption notification. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded...

The High Court rejected the application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the applicants u/s 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Court held that the...

Refund claim rejected by adjudicating authority on grounds that services provided by appellant to SOLCIL did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST...

Re-import of goods - Claim of exemption from customs duty - Whether the original export was under the claim of refund of IGST? - Appellant claimed that at the time of...

Classification dispute regarding imported goods "MPC7E MRATE IRB 10G/40G 100 QSFP28-MPC-L3 Line Cards [Router Line Cards]" under Customs Tariff Item (CTI) 8517 69 30 or...

Benefit to training partner approved by NSDC in entry no. 69 under exemption Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) is services in relation to the schemes run by...

The appellant's claim for Rs. 9.21 crores, arising from the termination of an agreement due to non-renewal of a performance bank guarantee, was not considered by the...

Rejection of petition challenging classification of "Autoclaved Aerated Concrete blocks" (AAC Blocks) under residuary Entry 69 of Part C instead of proposed Entry 15 of...

Refund claim - rejected on the ground that the appellant cannot claim the refund directly without challenging the assessment order (bill of entry) - refund cannot be denied - AT

The case involved a dispute over a refund claim u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim did...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

Assessee's claim for exemption u/s 10(35) was rejected by CPC while processing return u/s 143(1)(a), which attained finality as assessee failed to challenge it before...

NCLAT upheld rejection of appellant's belated claim for interest payments in liquidation proceedings. Appellant failed to file claims within prescribed timeline and...

Benefit of exemption subject to the condition that no Cenvat Credit is availed - The appellant are eligible for exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. when they...

Rejected damaged paddy is classified under HSN 1006 10 90, not 1006 10 10, as it lacks characteristics of seed quality cereal crop and is unfit for human consumption....

Quick Updates: