Maintainability of appeal before the High Court - A plain ...

Court Rules Appeal Maintainable u/s 130(2) of 1962 Act, Dismissing Respondents' Objection as Without Merit.

July 28, 2022

Case Laws Customs HC

Maintainability of appeal before the High Court - A plain reading of sub-section (2) of section 130 of the 1962 Act would demonstrate, that the appeal to this Court could be preferred either by the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs or even “other party” aggrieved by any order of the Tribunal. The DA, to our minds, would if nothing else, fall within the category of “other party”. Therefore, this objection is without merit, and hence is rejected. - The preliminary objection taken by the respondents, as regards the maintainability of the instant appeal, cannot be sustained - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability of appeal before the High Court - A plain ...

Court Rules Appeal Maintainable u/s 130(2) of 1962 Act, Dismissing Respondents' Objection as Without Merit.

July 28, 2022

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

Suit decreed partially for recovery, doctrine of lis pendens applied. Agreement dated 17.08.1990 not found fraudulent or result of collusion between plaintiff and...

Seizure of goods as smuggled into the country from Myanmar u/s 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. The burden of proof lies on the respondent u/s 123 to show that the seized...

In light of the legal provisions and precedent, the Court held that even if excess stock is found during a survey, proceedings u/s 130 of the UPGST Act cannot be...

CIT(A) allowed assessee to withdraw appeal against section 263 revision order, stating Tribunal quashed section 263 order and CIT(A) erred in not deciding appeal merits....

Validity of reopening assessment challenged due to non-disposal of objections raised by assessee against reassessment. Deduction u/s 24(a) proposed to be disallowed....

Validity of summons issued u/s 70 - Proper officer - The High court examined Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act and determined that its scope differed from that of Section...

Validity of assessment - Non issuing of notice u/s 143(2) - Applicability of provisions of section 292BB - Before the Tribunal the AR could not submit any proof for...

The Appellate Court exceeded its jurisdiction u/s 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by setting aside an arbitral award that had already been confirmed...

Seeking provisional release of detained goods alongwith vehicle - when the goods are in transit and are to be confiscated they are required to be seized for the purpose...

The case involves the interpretation of u/s 55(2)(b)(i) and u/s 55(2)(aa)(B)(iiia) of the Income Tax Act regarding the cost of acquisition of bonus shares. The Tribunal...

Principles of natural justice - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's argument regarding the violation of procedural fairness, as the impugned order failed to...

The High Court held that the products Para Cumidine (ITC HS Code 2921 49 20) and Diaminostilbene 2, 2-disulphonic acid (DASDA) (ITC HS Code 2921 59 40) were part of...

Seeking release of conveyance and the goods - It is evident that it is after issuing MOV 1 and 2, the first respondent had issued the show cause notice in GST MOV-10 u/s...

The High Court quashed the orders initiating proceedings u/s 130 of the GST Act against the petitioner for excess stock found during inspection/search u/s 67. It held...

Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO,...

Quick Updates: