Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2022 Year 2022 This

Revision u/s 263 - Estimation of bogus purchases - it is ...


PCIT Rightly Exercised Jurisdiction u/s 263 Due to AO's Inadequate Probe into Bogus Purchase Allegations.

December 1, 2022

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Revision u/s 263 - Estimation of bogus purchases - it is incumbent upon the AO to inquire into the matter and take the proceedings to the logical end. Having not done so, PCIT was fully justified in exercising jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Distinction between "lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry" emphasized. Assessee underwent rigorous assessment proceedings with multiple notices and replies. AO...

  2. The High Court held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act in this case. The Assessing...

  3. The Appellate Tribunal examined the issue of invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 in a case involving receipts of accommodation entries and reopening of assessment....

  4. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Jurisdiction exercised by ld PCIT under section 263 of the Act is not in accordance with law. PCIT has selected the item (share capital and...

  5. The ITAT upheld the revision order u/s 263 The PCIT demonstrated that the Assessing Officer failed to examine/inquire/investigate transactions in the demat account, bank...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 due to discrepancies in the assessment order, including undisclosed TDS, differences in purchases...

  7. Revision u/s 263 - deduction under section 54B - No doubt the assessee declared capital gain but, whether its exemption can be claimed on purchase of other agriculture...

  8. Assessee surrendered income during survey u/s 133A as unaccounted professional receipts, which AO accepted as professional income taxable at normal rates. PCIT invoked...

  9. The Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal against the invocation of Section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) for disallowing the entire...

  10. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - the assessee had duly explained as to why certain receipts though subjected to TDS, would not be liable to be offered to tax such as...

  11. The case pertains to the revision of an assessment order u/s 263 regarding the applicability of the higher tax rate u/s 115BBE on unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. The...

  12. The assessee dealt with a penny stock, and the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper inquiry during reassessment proceedings. The Principal Commissioner of...

  13. Revision u/s 263 - Bogus LTCG/Share transaction - as per CIT AO failed to make necessary enquiries to ascertain the actual strength of the company, investment profile of...

  14. Validity of an ex-parte revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act. The key points are: The PCIT passed...

  15. Revision u/s 263 by CIT- AO is first an investigating officer thereafter he is an adjudicator but here in this case, the AO remained silent, but, he ought to have...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates