Scheme of amalgamation - notice u/s 142(1) - appointed date v/s ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 6, 2013

Scheme of amalgamation - notice u/s 142(1) - appointed date v/s effective date - transferor company no longer survives & the question of assessing such company for the purpose of income tax would not possible - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Scheme of amalgamation - notice u/s 142(1) - appointed date v/s ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 6, 2013

You may also like:

Validity of reassessment proceedings against non-existent entities or amalgamating companies. The key points are: 1) Initiating or continuing proceedings against a...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - failure to comply with the notices issued by the A.O u/s 142(1) - the non-compliance on the part of the assessee is due to the reason of...

Levying penalty u/s 272A(1) - non-compliance of the notice - Nonappearance of the assessee in response to the initial notice under section 142(1) of the Act was not...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - default on the part of the assessee for not complying with the notices issued by the AO u/s 142(1) - Even if the AO issued 4 notices under...

Non-issuance of a proper Show Cause Notice u/s 73(1) of the State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (AGST Act) prior to passing the impugned order u/s 73(9) violates...

The High Court held that the reopening notice issued u/s 148 against a non-existent entity, i.e., the amalgamating company that had ceased to exist due to an approved...

Validity of demand of GST - summary of show cause in Form GST-DRC-01 under Rule 142(1) - The uploading or serving of summary of show cause in Form GST-DRC-01 under Rule...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) due to the Accountant's Covid-19...

Addition u/s 56(1) - shares received by the assessee company at the time of amalgamation - the Revenue is not precluded from ascertaining as to whether the scheme of...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the penalty imposed u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) was not legally valid. The Assessing Officer failed to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of notice u/s 142(1) - The judgment/decision on the strength of which we had expressed deletion of penalty are not applicable, as...

Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - non-compliance of notice issued u/s 142(1) - The inaction of the AO on the various letters filed by the assessee which enable the assessee to...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of the notices issued u/s. 142(1) of the Act, neither by filing reply nor seeking time to file Reply - the assessee has...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - default / non-compliance of notice issued u/s 142(1) - AO has completely ignored the request of the assessee then the question of paying the...

Quick Updates: