Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2023 Year 2023 This

Right of claim over the amount available - Avoidance of ...


Insolvency Funds from Avoided Transactions Must Enhance Creditor Asset Pool, Not Go to Resolution Applicant.

January 17, 2023

Case Laws     Insolvency and Bankruptcy     HC

Right of claim over the amount available - Avoidance of preferential transactions - The amount that is available after the transactions are avoided cannot go to the kitty of the resolution applicant - The purpose of the avoidance application as stated above is to enhance the asset pool available for the decision of creditors who are primarily financial institutions and have taken the haircut in agreeing to accept a much lesser amount than what was due and payable to them. This is public money, and, therefore, the amount that is received if and when transactions are avoided and receive the imprimatur of adjudicating authority must be distributed amongst the committee of creditors in a manner determined by the adjudicating authority. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Eligibility of persons to be resolution applicant - The word “such creditor” in Section 29A(h) has to be interpreted to mean similarly placed creditors after the...

  2. The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

  3. Validity of Winding up order - Antrix, which initiated the proceedings for winding up, is neither a financial creditor nor an operational creditor nor a corporate...

  4. The High Court ruled that security interests over assets of a corporate debtor to secure amounts due under a judgment or decree must give way to the provisions of the...

  5. The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the Resolution Plan submitted by the Resolution Applicant did not violate any provisions of law, including Regulation 37(ba)...

  6. This case deals with the extinguishment of demands due to the non-filing of claims by the revenue during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the...

  7. Exclusion of commercial spaces from the assets of the Corporate Debtor and the entitlement of dissenting Financial Creditors u/s 30(2)(b) of the Insolvency and...

  8. The Appellate Tribunal found the Interim Resolution Professional's (IRP) conduct to be biased, premeditated, and authoritarian, violating the core objectives and...

  9. Without initiating any ‘Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process’ against the ‘Principal Borrower’, it is always open to the ‘Financial Creditor’ to initiate ‘Corporate...

  10. Without initiating any ‘Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process’ against the ‘Principal Borrower’, it is always open to the ‘Financial Creditor’ to initiate ‘Corporate...

  11. Validity of Resolution Plan - Category A are those assets which are required for the Corporate Debtor for running the business and non-core assets are those assets which...

  12. The High Court allowed the application seeking dissolution of a company (in liquidation) u/s 481 of the Companies Act, 1956. As the company had insufficient funds and no...

  13. Corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) - claims filed under a CIRP by "decree holder" - Once admitted as a creditor, the efforts must be to preserve and maximise...

  14. External Commercial Borrowings (ECB) Policy – ECB facility for Resolution Applicants under Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

  15. Resolution professional doesn’t require nod of shareholders/members for insolvency resolution

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates