Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2013 Year 2013 This

Sec. 269SS and 269T - there is bonafide belief to the effect ...


Advances for Share Allotment Not Classified as Loans; No Penalties u/ss 271D and 271E of IT Act.

February 22, 2013

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Sec. 269SS and 269T - there is bonafide belief to the effect that the receipt of advances against allotment of shares and repayment of share money would not be termed as loans or deposits - no penalty u/s 271D and 271E- AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Violation of the provisions of Sections 269SS and 269T - scope of the term "loan" and "deposit" - Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - amount received on account of share...

  2. Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

  3. Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee...

  4. Treatment of Share Application money as loans & Advances(269SS) - Penalty under 271D - Share application monies received by a company, pending allotment of shares, do...

  5. Penalty u/s. 271D - assessee has repaid loans/ deposits from various sister concerns through journal entries, i.e., otherwise than account payee cheques/draft - though...

  6. The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

  7. Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

  8. The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

  9. Penalty u/s.271D & 271E - Period of limitation for imposing penalty u/s 275(1)(c) - he discussion by the AO in the assessment order and making reference to the Addl. CIT...

  10. Penalty imposed u/s 271D and 271E - the availing and re–payment of loan through book entries was prior to 12th June 2012. Therefore non–compliance to the provisions of...

  11. The Punjab and Haryana High Court held that undisclosed income found during a search, related to a pawning business, falls within the scope of Section 269SS of the...

  12. Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - allegation of cash loan having been taken/repaid - The ITAT underscored the principle that penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for...

  13. Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - creation/ assignment of debt and liabilities vide journal entries - These entries arise in the normal course of day to day business...

  14. Penalties levied u/ss 271D and 271E were challenged. The assessee was found to have violated Sections 269SS and 269T. However, there was no concrete finding that the...

  15. Penalty levied u/s. 271D and 271E - The assessee has filed affidavits of the lenders who are agriculturist to substantiate that they have advanced cash loan for the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates