Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2023 Year 2023 This

Finalisation of provisional assessment - Denial of adjustment of ...


Refund Denied: Duty Burden Passed to Consignee M/s. BPCL, Not Appellant M/s. BHEL, u/r 7(6.

June 2, 2023

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Finalisation of provisional assessment - Denial of adjustment of excess payment against the alleged short payment of duty - appellant had passed on the excess amount of duty as CENVAT Credit - There is a categorical finding in the adjudication order that the duty burden has been borne not by M/s. BHEL, but by M/s. BPCL, the consignee of the goods. The refund of the excess payment was not sanctioned for the reason that the duty burden has been passed on to M/s. BPCL attracting the provisions of Rule 7(6) - order of lower authorities sustained - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. CESTAT allowed refund of customs duty paid twice through customs broker for same import consignment. Appellant demonstrated through Bill of Entry, payment challans, and...

  2. Refund of the excess amount that was subsequently refused to be paid to the Appellant by the Refund Sanctioning Authority - Finalization of provisional assessment - Sale...

  3. Refund of IGST amount and duty drawback - In view of the fact that the applications for refund of IGST and duty drawback are still pending, it is directed that the...

  4. CESTAT allowed appeal concerning refund of CVD and ACD. Original authority's rejection was based on contradictory findings - accepting CA certificate showing non-passing...

  5. Refund of export duty paid in excess - conclusive evidence to discharge the burden of unjust enrichment - The CESTAT observed that the contract between the buyer and...

  6. The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

  7. The petitioner's denial of refund of input tax credit debited as a pre-deposit was challenged. The court held that the non-inclusion of freight and pumping charges...

  8. Reversal of Cenvat Credit - Whether the appellant is liable to pay 5% / 6% / 7% of the value of exempted services (trading) as they failed to maintain separate accounts...

  9. Refund claim of excess duty denied due to unjust enrichment - goods sold based on LME price index. Revenue contended appellant booked excess duty as revenue expenditure...

  10. Power to issue SCN - Recovery of erroneous refund with interest - It is more than apparent that section 11A of the Excise Act cannot be resorted to by the Department for...

  11. CESTAT held that the appellant's refund claims following provisional assessment finalization were barred by unjust enrichment doctrine. While the appellant demonstrated...

  12. CESTAT ruled that in provisional assessment cases, adjustments of excess duty payments against shortfalls must be handled comprehensively. The tribunal determined that...

  13. The appellants challenged the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) denying eligible interest on the refunded amount. The court held that interest accrued on the deposited...

  14. The case involves supply of goods to power projects through international competitive biddings without duty payment. Appellant faced denial of exemption u/s N/N....

  15. Petitioner made mistake in not showing correct refund amount in GSTR-3B for July and August 2017. Delay not attributable to petitioner as respondents admitted technical...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates