Revision u/s 263 - validity of notice as issued by the ITO who ...

Notice u/s 263 Invalid as Issued by ITO Below PCIT Rank; No Delegation Allowed in Statute.

July 22, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 - validity of notice as issued by the ITO who is below the rank of ld. PCIT - The statute never permitted in section 263 for delegation of power to the authority below for issuance of notice for initiation of proceedings. - The delegation if possible if permitted by the law. DR was unable to place any judgment against the submission of assessee. Accordingly, the notice issued U/s 263 is invalid. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - validity of notice as issued by the ITO who ...

Notice u/s 263 Invalid as Issued by ITO Below PCIT Rank; No Delegation Allowed in Statute.

July 22, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - PCIT issued the above show cause notice u/s 263 in respect of specified domestic transactions referred to in clause (i) of section 92BA of the Act...

Revision u/s 263 against non-Est order - The ITAT held that, return filed beyond the prescribed time limit under notice u/s 148 should not be treated as non-est. -...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

Revision u/s 263 - requirement to issue show cause notice u/s 263 - denial of natural justice - We do not agree with the contention of the ld Counsel to the effect that...

Jurisdiction powers to issue Reopening notice in metro city - It was established that the notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued by an Income Tax Officer (ITO),...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of an order passed u/s 143(3) by the Assessing Officer (AO), which was revised by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax...

Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO,...

The assessee was allowed deduction u/s 54/54F without proper examination of relevant details and materials. The Assessing Officer (AO) framed the assessment u/s 143(3)...

The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS. The PCIT observed that the assessee, along with two co-owners, had purchased an immovable property...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - A reading of the same clearly shows that after having made a contradictory observation on issue of lack of enquiry of cash deposit aspect for...

Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - Section 56(2)(viib) of the Act s only applicable to residents and not to Non Residents. - In the instant case also Ld. A.O...

Revision u/s 263 - Unexplained cash investment u/s 69 - PCIT has no right to review the order which was subject matter of appeal before Ld. CIT(A) and we notice that the...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 regarding the validity of a Limited scrutiny Assessment. The PCIT observed that the AO did not...

Revision u/s 263 - Out of the three issues raised in the show cause notice u/s 263 of the Act, in two issues ld. AO has conducted complete enquiry during re-assessment...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - requirement of issuing show-cause notice - there is nothing in the Section 263 to raise the said notice to the status of a mandatory show-cause...

Quick Updates: