Validity of assessment orders passed for the years 2018-2019 to ...

Court Rules on Assessment Order Challenges: Separate Appeals Required for Each Year; Single Petition Dismissed.

February 19, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Validity of assessment orders passed for the years 2018-2019 to 2022-2023 - The High court notes that each assessment order gives rise to a separate cause of action, and challenges against multiple orders in a single petition are not warranted unless lack of jurisdiction is specifically alleged. - The HC deems it fit to dismiss the writ petition while granting the petitioner the liberty to file appeals against specific orders within the prescribed timeframes.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of assessment orders passed for the years 2018-2019 to ...

Court Rules on Assessment Order Challenges: Separate Appeals Required for Each Year; Single Petition Dismissed.

February 19, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The central issue revolves around the maintainability of a single appeal filed by the Revenue against multiple Bills of Entry. As per Rule 6(A) of the CESTAT Procedure...

One appeal filed by the Revenue against 7 Bills of Entry is not maintainable. As per Rule 6(A) of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, when the Commissioner (Appeals)...

Rule 6(A) requires filing separate appeals for each order-in-original. In a case involving multiple Bills of Entry, if a common order-in-appeal disposed of appeals...

HC held that show cause notices under Section 74(1) of CGST Act for alleged tax evasion must be issued separately for each financial year rather than through...

The HC held that the requirement to file a certified copy of an appealed order under GST Rules is procedural rather than mandatory. The petitioner had filed their appeal...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

This notification amends the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014, by inserting a proviso in sub-rule (2) of rule 9B. The proviso states that a...

CENVAT Credit - duty paying invoices - performa invoices - the documents required under the Rule 9 are not confined to merely invoices but these may be any documents,...

The appeal centered around the import of consignments comprising 'frames' and 'slides' of handguns by the writ petitioner (Syndicate), which were seized by the...

The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

The High Court directed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Guwahati, to ensure disposal of the petitioner's appeals filed for assessment years 2020-21 and 2018-19...

HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

The Madras High Court considered the issue of personal hearing notice u/s FEMA 1999. The Court held that Rule 4(3) does not require the reasoned opinion to be...

Determination of time limit for filing of Appeal before the Appellate Authority - Delay due to the online system's failure to upload the Order-in-Original with the...

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the show-cause notice dated 20.08.2024 issued by the respondent authority in relation to the refund of integrated taxes...

Quick Updates: