CIRP - Admissibility of two additional documents - The Appellate ...

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

April 12, 2024

CIRP - Admissibility of two additional documents - The Appellate Tribunal analyzed the timing of the documents in question. It noted that the arbitration petition and the order were both initiated after the filing of the Section 9 Application. Considering the observations of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the relevance of the documents to the ongoing proceedings, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the Adjudicating Authority to dismiss the application for additional documents. - It concluded that the arbitration proceedings initiated by the Corporate Debtor were subsequent to the Section 9 Application and thus had no bearing on it.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CIRP - Admissibility of two additional documents - The Appellate ...

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

April 12, 2024

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - second revisional jurisdiction of Pr. CIT - Whether the AO (called second AO) has not conducted enquiry while framing re-assessment...

Initiation of CIRP - pre-existing dispute or not - NCLT rejected the application - NCLAT allowed the application admitting the additional evidences - the impugned order...

The scheme of the Act would not permit the Tribunal to jettison the first appeal before the Commissioner and allow itself to act as first Appellate Authority. If the...

Rectification of defects in section 7 application - ambit of a Power of Attorney - Home Buyers - NCLT rejected the application for initiation of CIRP - The appellate...

First time importers, verification of documents - submission of KYC documents and procedure to be followed

Admissibility of CIRP u/s 9 of the IBC - The Appellate Tribunal found that there was sufficient evidence to support the admission of CIRP proceedings. The Respondent had...

Assessee filed second rectification application u/s 254, raising same grounds as first miscellaneous application which was already rejected. Tribunal held that except...

Rejection of cross objections as time barred - in the Act, no such time period is prescribed. Time fixed by the learned Appellate Authority was fixed by him and there...

Cenvat credit for service tax paid on 'management fee' and 'common sharing of Head office services' - invoices from the service provider were not in the prescribed...

The Appellate Tribunal considered an ex-parte assessment u/s 144 and an application for additional evidence. The Tribunal held that since the assessment was completed...

CIRP - The NCLAT upheld the decision to reject inflated claims by the financial creditor, Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund (SASF), and supported the termination of the...

Admissibility of Cenvat credit - Two different orders passed by the Tribunal by admitting the Cenvat credit in one and denying in another - matter to be reheard by the...

Request for conversion of free Shipping Bills into Drawback Shipping Bills - Long lapsed period between exports (1998) and the request for conversion (2007) - The...

Initiation of CIRP - Relevant date of default - The Tribunal noted the appellant’s arguments about defaults prior to the RBI’s COVID-19 moratorium guidelines but also...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the Annual Mine Closure Cost (AMCC) deposited by the Corporate Debtor in an Escrow Account belongs to the Corporate Debtor and cannot be...

Quick Updates: