The Appellate Tribunal addressed a case involving revision u/s ...

Revision u/s 263 initiated on ICDS grounds deemed unsustainable. AO's acceptance of assessee's explanation upheld.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 6, 2024

The Appellate Tribunal addressed a case involving revision u/s 263 by PCIT questioning the recognition of liabilities 'Nardana Claim-1' and 'Nardana Claim-2' under ICDS. The Tribunal found that AO adequately investigated the issues through queries and responses from the assessee, rejecting PCIT's claim of lack of investigation. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's explanation that the liabilities were not recognized as income due to pending court disputes, following a court decision on income accrual. Citing Malabar Industries Co. Ltd., the Tribunal held that AO's view favoring the assessee was valid. PCIT's revision based on ICDS violations was deemed unsustainable, leading to the quashing of the revision order and restoration of the AO's assessment order. Assessee's appeal was allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal addressed a case involving revision u/s ...

Revision u/s 263 initiated on ICDS grounds deemed unsustainable. AO's acceptance of assessee's explanation upheld.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 6, 2024

You may also like:

Assessee surrendered income during survey u/s 133A as unaccounted professional receipts, which AO accepted as professional income taxable at normal rates. PCIT invoked...

The case pertains to the revision of an assessment order u/s 263 regarding the applicability of the higher tax rate u/s 115BBE on unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. The...

Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

Validity of revision proceedings u/s 263 - Adoption of either of view by AO - allowability under section 36(1)(viia) - The court concludes that the original assessment...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

Revision u/s 263 - the issue was duly considered by Ld. AO after considering assessee’s detailed submissions. The view could not be said to be unsustainable view and it...

Assessment proceedings examined assessee's claim relating to ICDS adjustment made in intimation u/s 143(1). AO issued notices seeking information, assessee provided...

Revision u/s 263 - PCIT partially looking into the assessment records and initiated the Revision proceedings on the ground that the assessee failed to submit evidences...

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

Appraisal report available but AO ignored, a fit case for revision u/s 263 - HC

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposit during the demonization period - The tribunal noted that the AO had conducted an adequate inquiry into the assessee's cash...

Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT AO had wrongly allowed the assessee exemption of capital gains claimed u/s 54B - Tribunal found that neither any inquiry was made by the AO...

Revision u/s 263 - It is evident that A.O. made enquiries on the issue and assessee complied to the enquiries and filed all the required details. Thus, it is not a case...

Revision u/s 263 - another possible view of the matter - The appellant challenged the jurisdiction of the PCIT, arguing that the original assessment order by the AO was...

Quick Updates: