The case involved the determination of assessable value u/s 4 of ...

CESTAT ruled on assessable value under Section 4 of Central Excise Act. Expenses not in cash but as benefits are not included.

June 7, 2024

Case Laws Central Excise AT

The case involved the determination of assessable value u/s 4 of Central Excise Act and Rule 6 of Valuation Rules. The issue was the inclusion of non-cash benefits as additional consideration. CESTAT held that demand on "Trade Margin" was not sustainable, following a precedent. Another bench set aside adverse inferences, noting the sensitivity of the product and PSU status. The impugned order was found meritless and set aside, allowing the appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involved the determination of assessable value u/s 4 of ...

CESTAT ruled on assessable value under Section 4 of Central Excise Act. Expenses not in cash but as benefits are not included.

June 7, 2024

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit - Other than Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, there is no other provision either in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 or in Central Excise...

CESTAT held that appellant was entitled to benefit under N/N. 94/96-Cus for imported goods that were initially exported and returned. While the adjudicating authority...

CESTAT ruled that specifications, drawings, and designs provided by Company M to appellant manufacturer should not be included in assessable value for excise duty...

Assessable value – As per Rule 5 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000, the transportation charges shown separately in the invoice or charge separately are not...

The issue pertained to the inclusion of demurrage charges in the assessable value for payment of customs duty under the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of...

CESTAT ruled that specifications, designs, and drawings provided by manufacturer M to vendors for manufacturing vehicle components should not be included in assessable...

The Department of Commerce (DoC) has issued clarifications regarding the newly inserted SEZ Rule 11B, notified on 6.12.2023, which allows the setup of non-SEZ IT/ITES...

Amendments to various rules and forms - Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2022 - Notification

Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2018 - Corresponding rules amended accordingly.

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 2012 - (Form 23AC & 23ACA) - Notification

The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of continuing an appeal post the NCLT's approval of the resolution plan. Referring to Rule 22 of CESTAT...

CESTAT rejected appeals for default under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, due to appellant's non-appearance at hearings without valid justification. Following...

The case involves an appeal before CESTAT regarding continuation post Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under IBC, 2016. NCLT approved a Resolution Plan...

Quick Updates: