CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the valuation of ...

Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of Appellant on service valuation issue. Separate charges for installation and transport/insurance.

Case Laws Service Tax

June 22, 2024

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the valuation of services in a case involving transport/insurance charges received by the Appellant for the erection and installation of transmission towers. The Tribunal held that the separate consideration for installation and transportation/insurance charges indicated distinct and independent activities under the service contract. Referring to a precedent, it emphasized that services should not be classified as a single composite service if they are distinct and independent. The Tribunal also rejected the extended period of limitation, noting that the allegation of suppression of facts was incorrect. Consequently, the demand for service tax was deemed legally unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the valuation of ...

Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of Appellant on service valuation issue. Separate charges for installation and transport/insurance.

Case Laws Service Tax

June 22, 2024

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal addressed issues regarding the method of valuation of electrical motors, whether to apply Rule 8 or Rule 4 of the Central Excise (Valuation)...

Method of valuation - Revenue neutrality - Extended period of limitation - goods transferred to another unit for captive consumption - to be valued in accordance with...

CESTAT address the issue of revision in duty liability of 'antenna' regarding assessable value under Customs Valuation Rules. The tribunal found flaws in the...

Income–tax (10th Amendment) Rules, 2018 - Form of appeal to the Appellate Tribunal

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the valuation of imported goods (ball valves/check valves/cartridges of brass). The rejection of declared value and...

Power of tribunal to review application - It is the well laid down proposition of law that ‘in the absence of any power of ‘Review’ or ‘Recall’ vested with the...

Valuation of imported goods - addition of royalty charges to value of imported goods in terms of Rule 9(1) (c) of Valuation Rules, 1988 and 10(1) (c) of the Valuation...

Valuation of goods - freight charges are separately recovered from the customers by issuing debit note, therefore the respondents are fulfilling the conditions imposed...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered the levy of service tax on air and ocean freight charges collected before and after 01.07.2012. The issue was whether these...

The Appellate Tribunal considered two main issues: 1. Addition u/s 37(1) - Assessee incurred business loss due to default in property payment, allowed as revenue loss. 2....

Enhancement made by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 251(1) r.w.s. 56(2) (viib) - AO substituted fair market value determined by the assessee through his own valuation - Assessees...

Method of valuation - Rule 11 is adopted when the situation is not covered by any of the other methods of valuation prescribed from Rule 4 to 10A. The method of...

Manual filing of applications for Advance Ruling and appeals before Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. It was questioned whether a precise charge was brought against the assessee and if the...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed three main issues raised by the Assessee against the assessment order. Firstly, regarding the disallowance of job work charges to a...

Quick Updates: