Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2024 Year 2024 This

The case involves a dispute regarding clandestine removal of ...


In a case about missing goods and personnel penalty, the Tribunal found no proof of wrongdoing by the company. Industry standards matter!

Case Laws     Central Excise

June 28, 2024

The case involves a dispute regarding clandestine removal of goods by an Appellant company. The Appellate Tribunal held that the allegation of clandestine removal and suppression of facts failed as no evidence of unaccounted purchases or sales was presented. The Tribunal found that the determination of suppressed quantities based on maximum installed capacity was unsubstantiated. The Tribunal also noted that the Department's withdrawal of a previous letter indicated a lack of clarity regarding the recording of goods. The Tribunal pointed out that normal industry factors were ignored in determining maximum capacity. Ultimately, the impugned Order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalties...

  2. Levy of penalty on the Director of the Company - Valuation of imported goods - import of luxury vehicles by misusing the Transfer of Residence (TR) Scheme - The Tribunal...

  3. The Appellate Tribunal found the Appellant Company guilty of contravening u/s 9(1)(a) of FERA 1973 by making payments to a person outside India without RBI permission....

  4. Levy of penalty for abetting in mis-declaration of imported goods - Revocation of Courier License - The tribunal ruled that penalty under this section could only be...

  5. CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

  6. Manpower Supply service - centralized group company providing various services to other group company - MPCMS is providing personnel to MFL and other group companies -...

  7. The case involved a Customs Broker facing penalties under Customs Brokers Licensing Regulation 2013 for alleged aiding in misclassification of goods. The Appellate...

  8. The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed misdeclaration and undervaluation of imported goods, specifically modems and automated teller machine processors. The...

  9. The Tribunal has the authority to order the purchase of shares by the company from any member u/s 242(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013, in cases of oppression and...

  10. The Appellate Tribunal considered the levy of penalty u/s 270A. The Assessing Officer (AO) imposed the penalty u/s 270A(9)(a) for misrepresentation of facts and...

  11. Levy of Personal Penalty on the Director of the company and Drivers of the trucks (transporters) - Penalties u/r 26 of CER - Abetment - Clandestine removal - gutka - The...

  12. Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

  13. Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

  14. The case involves a dispute over whether imported goods qualify as 'Capital Goods' for exemption under a customs notification. The Revenue alleged that the imports did...

  15. Duty demand - Bonded Warehouse - seizure of 264 cases found outside the warehouse - Unauthorisedly clearance of 27 cases from the notified public bonded warehouse - On...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates