Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court reviewed penalties imposed for lack of e-way ...


High Court reduces penalties for e-way bill violations, cites lack of fairness. Petitioner to pay Rs. 15 Lakhs to PM Cares Fund.

Case Laws     GST

June 28, 2024

The High Court reviewed penalties imposed for lack of e-way bills, noting violations of natural justice and lack of proper consideration. Bank Guarantees expired without renewal, leading to penalties. Petitioner directed to pay Rs. 15 Lakhs to PM Cares Fund and Rs. 75,000 to State GST authority. Petitioner exempt from GST on machinery movement. Penalty reduced to Rs. 25,000. Petitioner to donate Rs. 15 Lakhs to PM Cares Fund. Respondent No. 3 to investigate staff responsibility for expired Guarantees. Writ petition concluded.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The case involved a violation of the FEMA Act due to accepting and placing bets on cricket matches for clients. The appellant was linked to the raided premises where...

  2. Levy of penalty- Fraudulent issuance of GDRs by the Company - the imposition of penalty upon the appellant after 12 years from date of resigning is excessive. In a large...

  3. Valuation of imported goods - on the basis of wrong documents submitted by the overseas entity, the appellant had filed the Bills of Entry, the lenient approach can be...

  4. Levy of 200% penalty - Failure to renew e-Way Bill - The appellants should have done since the goods were sold in transit. Therefore, there is a violation had committed...

  5. Levy of redemption fine and penalty - re-export of goods - misdeclaration of goods - the penalty imposed under Section 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962 is proper....

  6. Levy of maximum Penalty - Delay in submitting the documents for finalization of the Bills of Entry - The Department sought to increase the penalty from Rs. 20,000/- to...

  7. Exemption u/s 11 - AO by invoking proviso to Section 2(15) and denying the exemption - Receipts from business activities exceeded the threshold of Rs. 10 lakhs and Rs....

  8. Registration u/s 80G(5) - The rejection was based on allegations of discrepancy in the organization's name, violation of FCRA provisions, and involvement in religious...

  9. Expenditure on remuneration of employees (i.e., four servants and two drivers) - confirmed the addition at Rs.1.50 lakhs as against at Rs.4.68 lakhs by the CIT(A) - AT

  10. Penalty - instead of issuing the show cause notice for recovery of the 15% amount of penalty, the department had proceeded against the appellant for confirmation of the...

  11. CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

  12. Imposition of penalty u/r 15(2) of CCR, 2004 - CENVAT Credit - No evidence of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts which are essential conditions...

  13. Capital vs revenue expenditure – Following the matching concept, the materiality concept and Accounting Standard AS 26 in the assessee's case before us, the amount of Rs....

  14. The Appellate Tribunal considered whether the assessee, a trust registered u/s 12AA, qualified for exemption u/s 11 as a charitable entity. The AO argued the trust's...

  15. Seizure of Gold Bars - Confiscation - Penalty u/s 112(b) - The case involves the interception of the Appellant carrying 17 pieces of gold of foreign origin in Kolkata....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates