Validity of reassessment proceedings challenged - capital gain ...

Reassessment invalid: No fresh material for reopening. Disclosed facts in original assessment. Mere change of opinion untenable. Impugned notice unsustainable. Entitled to co-owner's benefit.

Case Laws Income Tax

July 9, 2024

Validity of reassessment proceedings challenged - capital gain on co-owned land sale - reassessment based on DVO report alleging suppression of lower valuation - reasons recorded did not mention forming reason to believe due to DVO report in co-owner's case - reliance on DVO report to justify reopening untenable as no fresh material part of recorded reasons - petitioner fully disclosed material facts during original assessment - change of opinion for reopening by impugned notice u/s 148 untenable - impugned notice unsustainable - assessee entitled to benefit enjoyed by co-owners whose valuation accepted - permitting impugned notice an exercise in futility - assessee appeal allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of reassessment proceedings challenged - capital gain ...

Reassessment invalid: No fresh material for reopening. Disclosed facts in original assessment. Mere change of opinion untenable. Impugned notice unsustainable. Entitled to co-owner's benefit.

Case Laws Income Tax

July 9, 2024

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment after four years and the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the original assessment was...

The High Court held that the reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 were invalid. The assessee, a partner in a firm, had disclosed all financial transactions and...

The High Court held that the jurisdictional facts necessary to invoke Section 147 for reassessment were absent. The reassessment was initiated after the four-year...

Reopening of assessment after four years is invalid as the recorded reasons do not mention any failure by the assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts...

Assessment completed u/s 143(3) accepting assessee's return, which included export incentive and foreign exchange fluctuation as other business income. Subsequently,...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The High Court noted that the extended period of six years for reassessment could only be invoked under specific circumstances, one of...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - In the instant case the primary facts were already disclosed in the Notes to Accounts filed along with the balance-sheet...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as Assessing Officer (AO) failed to record that assessee did not disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for...

Reopening of Assessment u/s 147 - investment in NCDs unexplained - difference between accrual of income and receipt of income - reopening after the expiry of four years...

The High Court held that the Assessing Officer cannot reopen the assessment u/s 147 merely based on a change of opinion. The assessee had fully and truly disclosed all...

Reassessment proceedings initiated solely based on an audit objection without fresh tangible material are impermissible. A mere change of opinion by the Assessing...

Validity of reopening assessment u/s 147 challenged. Profit earned by trading in shares treated as unexplained credit u/s 68. Held: Petitioner disclosed all material...

The ITAT Nagpur considered the validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 147. The AO issued notice beyond four years alleging capital gain on "Sale of Vehicles" escaped...

Reopening of assessment - reasons to believe - On the issue of disclosure and compliance with TDS provisions, the court found that the petitioner had indeed disclosed...

Reassessment u/s 148 - exemption u/s 10AA - assessment completed u/s 143(3) reopened after expiry of 4 years - Revenue could not place any material to establish that...

Quick Updates: