Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) levied pursuant to order passed u/s 143(3) ...

ITAT quashed penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) as assessment order u/s 263 was unsustainable. Consequentially, penalty levy dismissed.

July 12, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) levied pursuant to order passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 263 was challenged before ITAT, Jaipur Bench. ITAT quashed the order of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax passed u/s 263. Consequentially, the assessment order, being the basis for penalty levy, became unsustainable. Hence, the consequent levy of penalty was dismissed by ITAT.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) levied pursuant to order passed u/s 143(3) ...

ITAT quashed penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) as assessment order u/s 263 was unsustainable. Consequentially, penalty levy dismissed.

July 12, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - period of limitation - treatment of lease rent income - in the revised return, assessee claimed the same as income from house property to claim...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - combined order of penalty for additions made vide order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. u/s 153A and u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 - AO required to initiate two...

ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal against CIT(A)'s order canceling penalty under s.271(1)(c). Assessee's claim for Mine Reclamation Expenses, though disallowed, was based...

The ITAT held that the final assessment order passed u/s 147 read with Section 144C(13) pursuant to the Dispute Resolution Panel's direction was invalid. The addition...

ITAT set aside penalty under s271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act following deletion of quantum addition in earlier proceedings. The underlying dispute involved classification...

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for disallowance of depreciation. The ITAT held that the assessee did not deliberately claim depreciation with an...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - ITAT deleted the penalty - Additions u/s 41(1) - one time settlement with the SBI - Bank has waived a sum including interest - assessee...

Quick Updates: