Impugned order partially upheld, petitioner directed to pay ...

Order upheld, pay tax demand & interest. Fresh orders on penalty in 6 months, Penalty may drop if 53rd GST Council norms applied.

July 13, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Impugned order partially upheld, petitioner directed to pay balance tax demand without prejudice to rights under remand order; petitioner also required to pay interest amount; respondents directed to pass fresh orders on merits regarding penalty u/s 122 of GST Act within six months, penalty may be dropped if 53rd GST Council recommendations implemented; petition disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Impugned order partially upheld, petitioner directed to pay ...

Order upheld, pay tax demand & interest. Fresh orders on penalty in 6 months, Penalty may drop if 53rd GST Council norms applied.

July 13, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Sub-section (5) and sub-section (6) inserted in section 16 of CGST Act retrospectively extend the time limit to avail input tax credit in certain specified cases...

Applicability: The waiver provisions u/s 128A apply to cases involving tax demands u/s 73 for financial years 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20, and cases involving...

Payment of interest u/s 244A to the deductor on the refund of tax made u/s 240 - Since we have awarded simple interest at 6%, we are not granting any cost in this case....

Suo-moto Adjustment of excess service tax paid - The excess amount paid in the month of May, 2011 adjusted by the appellants in the subsequent months tax liability is...

Finalisation of assessment and creation of extra demand - extension of the period of limitation - In the present case, since the assessment year is 2008-09, the period...

The High Court held that u/ss 28AA(1) and 28(10) of the Customs Act, there is no requirement for a demand for interest to be made in the original assessment order....

Refund claim towards excess custom duty paid - same amount paid twice through oversight and bonafide mistake - The petitioner is entitled to get refund along with...

Refusal to rectify the assessment order passed under Rule 142 (5) of the C.G.S.T. Rules, 2017 - denial of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The High Court found merit in the...

Appellants engaged in manufacturing dutiable goods and providing exempted trading services failed to maintain separate accounts for input services utilized in both...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271D, 271E and 271AAA - period of limitation - the period of six months from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty was...

This trade circular clarifies issues regarding implementation of provisions related to input tax credit in sub-sections (5) and (6) of Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017,...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

The High Court held that the limitation period prescribed in Section 153(3) of the Income Tax Act for issuing a fresh assessment order pursuant to an order u/s 254 (by...

Interest on refund due to error on the part of officer - As the amount of interest is being paid out of public exchequer, the Chief Principal Commissioner in-charge of...

Central Government notifies special procedure for rectification of orders issued u/ss 73, 74, 107, 108 confirming demand for wrong availment of input tax credit....

Quick Updates: