The Appellate Tribunal held that the Financial Creditor is ...

The Tribunal allowed the Financial Creditor to amend the date of default for computing limitation to file u/s 95.

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

July 17, 2024

The Appellate Tribunal held that the Financial Creditor is permitted to amend the date of default pleaded in the rejoinder affidavit, as the date of default is relevant for computing the limitation period for filing an application u/s 95. It is well-settled that a Financial Creditor can supplement the application by filing additional documents. In this case, the issue of invoking the Personal Guarantor's guarantee was specifically raised. The Adjudicating Authority granted time to the Personal Guarantor to file a reply opposing the new date of default inserted by the Petitioner. The Personal Guarantor has ample opportunity to satisfy the court that the amended date is not the correct date and raise contentions regarding limitation. Parties are entitled to bring additional materials on record, which can be accepted by the Adjudicating Authority. The rights of the Personal Guarantor are fully protected, and there are no grounds to entertain the appeal, which is dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal held that the Financial Creditor is ...

The Tribunal allowed the Financial Creditor to amend the date of default for computing limitation to file u/s 95.

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

July 17, 2024

You may also like:

Admission of Section 95 application filed by the Financial Creditor - Personal Guarantor of the Corporate Debtor - date of default - Assignment of debt - unstamped...

Maintainability of petition seeking initiation of CIRP against Personal Guarantor/Respondent - invocation of Bank guarantee and time limitation - The case involved an...

Disqualification of a director of the financial creditor to sign the Section 7 application was challenged. The application u/s 7, signed by the director of the financial...

The appeal challenged the admittance of a Section 95 application filed by the Financial Creditor, contending it was time-barred. The key issue was whether a letter dated...

The NCLAT upheld the admission of the Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor (Respondent No.1) for initiating CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. It held...

CIRP - Admissibility of Section 95 Applications against Personal Guarantors - discharge the liabilities of Personal Guarantors on approval of Resolution Plan - The...

The Appellate Tribunal affirmed the decision to exclude the Appellant and other unsecured Financial Creditors from the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The key issues were...

Initiation of CIRP - Financial Creditor - time limitation - The mere fact that Corporate Debtor did not appear or filed any objection, was not relevant for consideration...

The Appellant challenged the admission of the Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor, contending no debt was due as the application was premature. The...

Admission of section 7 application - financial debt or not - The Tribunal affirmed that the disbursal of ₹5 crores to the corporate debtor by the financial...

The court examined whether the application filed by the State Bank of India against the personal guarantor u/s 95 was barred by limitation. It was held that even if no...

Admissibility of application filed under CIRP during pendency of the proceeding of SARFAESI Act, 2002 - extension of period of limitation as per section 18 of Limitation...

Rejection of Section 7 Application filed by the Appellant (homebuyers) on the ground of non-compliance of Section 7, sub-section (1), 2nd Proviso - decree-holder is...

Admission of Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor - invocation of guarantee - application filed by the Financial Creditor is barred by Section 10A of...

Section 53(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) provides for the order of priority in the distribution of liquidation assets. Financial debts owed to unsecured...

Quick Updates: