Petitioner challenged assessment orders for Assessment Years ...

Tax assessment remanded for fresh orders; 25% disputed tax to be paid from e-cash ledger.

August 16, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Petitioner challenged assessment orders for Assessment Years 2017-2018 and 2020-2021. Court set aside impugned orders, remitting cases to respondent for fresh orders on merits. Petitioner directed to pay 25% of disputed tax from Electronic Cash Ledger and respond to Show Cause Notices within 30 days for respective Assessment Years. Impugned orders treated as addenda to Show Cause Notices. Petition disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Petitioner challenged assessment orders for Assessment Years ...

Tax assessment remanded for fresh orders; 25% disputed tax to be paid from e-cash ledger.

August 16, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, and excess availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The petitioner...

The HC set aside the impugned order due to violation of natural justice principles, specifically non-service of notices and orders that prevented the petitioner from...

HC set aside the impugned order regarding time limitation and GSTR-3B/GSTR-2A mismatch dispute. The petitioner's willingness to deposit 25% of disputed tax amount was...

The High Court held that petitioners are entitled to pay 10% of the disputed GST amount as a pre-condition for filing an appeal by debiting the amount available in the...

Validity of fresh assessment orders - HC quashed the assessment order invoking the writ jurisdiction - othing has been observed by the High Court on the merits of the...

The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the...

Challenge to assessment order and rectification order for assessment year 2018-19 - mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A/GSTR-2B - order challenged on grounds of...

Petitioner challenged impugned orders, recovery notices and bank attachment notice due to mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. Court accepted petitioner's contention of...

Interest Liability on Electronic Credit Ledger Payments - Seeking levy of interest only on that part of the tax which is paid in cash - The High court concluded that the...

Petition dismissed due to time limitation. Petitioners granted liberty to approach Appellate Commissioner u/s 107 of GST Act, subject to depositing 25% of disputed tax,...

Sections 132B, 140A, 153A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were analyzed regarding adjustment of seized cash against tax liability. The appellants claimed that cash...

The High Court held that the limitation period prescribed in Section 153(3) of the Income Tax Act for issuing a fresh assessment order pursuant to an order u/s 254 (by...

The petitioner challenged orders u/s 62 of the TNGST Act for failing to furnish returns from April to July 2023 within the prescribed period. The High Court held that...

The HC set aside orders passed under section 73 of the Act that were merely uploaded to the GST Portal without proper service to the petitioner. The court found these ex...

The High Court held that the delay in issuing the tax refund was subject to the strict limitation period prescribed u/s 254 read with Section 153(3). The Assessing...

Quick Updates: