Petitioner challenged assessment orders for Assessment Years ...

Tax assessment remanded for fresh orders; 25% disputed tax to be paid from e-cash ledger.

Case Laws GST

August 16, 2024

Petitioner challenged assessment orders for Assessment Years 2017-2018 and 2020-2021. Court set aside impugned orders, remitting cases to respondent for fresh orders on merits. Petitioner directed to pay 25% of disputed tax from Electronic Cash Ledger and respond to Show Cause Notices within 30 days for respective Assessment Years. Impugned orders treated as addenda to Show Cause Notices. Petition disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Petitioner challenged assessment orders for Assessment Years ...

Tax assessment remanded for fresh orders; 25% disputed tax to be paid from e-cash ledger.

Case Laws GST

August 16, 2024

You may also like:

The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, and excess availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The petitioner...

The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the...

Validity of fresh assessment orders - HC quashed the assessment order invoking the writ jurisdiction - othing has been observed by the High Court on the merits of the...

The High Court held that the limitation period prescribed in Section 153(3) of the Income Tax Act for issuing a fresh assessment order pursuant to an order u/s 254 (by...

Petition dismissed due to time limitation. Petitioners granted liberty to approach Appellate Commissioner u/s 107 of GST Act, subject to depositing 25% of disputed tax,...

The petitioner challenged orders u/s 62 of the TNGST Act for failing to furnish returns from April to July 2023 within the prescribed period. The High Court held that...

Interest Liability on Electronic Credit Ledger Payments - Seeking levy of interest only on that part of the tax which is paid in cash - The High court concluded that the...

The High Court held that the delay in issuing the tax refund was subject to the strict limitation period prescribed u/s 254 read with Section 153(3). The Assessing...

Validity of assessment order and bank attachment notice - no personal hearing provided - The High court notes that the petitioner was not heard before the order issuance...

Petitioner challenged the impugned order alleging violation of principles of natural justice, being unaware of the order and preceding notices, and discrepancy between...

Refusal to rectify the assessment order passed under Rule 142 (5) of the C.G.S.T. Rules, 2017 - denial of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The High Court found merit in the...

Sections 132B, 140A, 153A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were analyzed regarding adjustment of seized cash against tax liability. The appellants claimed that cash...

Impugned assessment order set aside due to violation of principles of natural justice. Petitioner not provided opportunity for personal hearing regarding mismatch of tax...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Earlier, ITAT remanded the matter back requesting the AO to provide reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. - AO must have...

For payment of tax, no assessment order is required and only in case of short payment of tax assessment is required after due notice - but for the deferral in payment of...

Quick Updates: