Cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 were made, and the assessee ...

Appellate Authority's Ruling on Cash Payments & Development Expenses Challenged.

August 22, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 were made, and the assessee provided a statement on oath, affidavits from the vendor, and explanations about the vendor's father's ill health and jail term, as well as the precondition of cash payment for the land deal. The appellate authority erred in rejecting these submissions and not considering business expediency. Regarding development expenses, the assessing officer disallowed 10% due to lack of vouchers, which was reduced to 5% by the appellate authority. Since no further evidence was produced, the Appellate Tribunal declined to interfere with the appellate authority's order on this issue.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 were made, and the assessee ...

Appellate Authority's Ruling on Cash Payments & Development Expenses Challenged.

August 22, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Manual filing of applications for Advance Ruling and appeals before Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling

The court held that the revenue authorities cannot question the decision of the Development Commissioner regarding bunching of products for domestic tariff area (DTA)...

Disallowance u/s.40A(3) - expenses towards air ticket and hotel expenses in cash in excess of prescribed limit u/s.40A(3) - there is merit in arguments of the assessee...

Periphery Development Expenses - Disallowance of expenses as only objection raised by the ld. AO is that some of the expenditure debited by the assessee cannot be termed...

Imported flow meters, pressure transmitters, level transmitters, parts and accessories were classified under tariff headings 9032 8990 and 9032 9000 or 9026 of Customs...

Disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 24(b) was rejected as the assessee was incurring interest expenditure for redevelopment of the house, and the CIT(A) rightly...

Cash payment for purchase of fruits - the payment in cash for purchase of agricultural commodities is covered by Rule 6DD(e) of the Rules and in such a situation merely...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

The applicant had suppressed material facts from the Authority for Advance Ruling by mis-declaring that the issue was not pending in any other proceedings, when in fact,...

HC held that u/s 40A, cash payments are restricted to prevent false income claims. Exemptions allowed for special circumstances where bank transactions are impossible....

Mere disallowance of expenses u/s 40A(3) would not invite penalty for concealing or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Assessee disclosed all particulars...

Disallowance u/s 37(1) - payments of expenditure by way of cash - Assessee has incurred 90% of expenses by way of cheque, meaning thereby, in case of business necessity...

ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision allowing deduction of Finance Lease Rental Payments under section 37(1) as revenue expenditure. Revenue's appeal challenging depreciation...

Determination of insolvency resolution costs - payments of costs and expenses incurred by the Resolution Professional (RP) - Neither the basis of the claim nor its...

Allowability of development expenses - CIT(A) was justified in allowing the claim of estimated development expenses booked by the assessee in the Profit & Loss Account...

Quick Updates: