Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

Court found violation of principles of natural justice as ...


Petitioner's rights violated due to lack of proper notice, court remands case for fresh adjudication with opportunity for defense.

Case Laws     GST

August 29, 2024

Court found violation of principles of natural justice as petitioner did not receive notices for proceedings leading to impugned orders. Though e-mail service cannot be ruled out, cancellation of registration could have resulted in petitioner not checking that e-mail ID. Court treated present proceedings as notice, granted three weeks to file response, and remanded matter to adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication after giving proper opportunity to petitioner. Impugned order set aside.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The High Court considered a case involving penalty imposition on a goods transportation transaction due to discrepancies between loaded goods and E-Invoice. The...

  2. Cancellation of petitioner's registration due to alleged fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts in obtaining registration. Proper Officer issued show cause...

  3. Principles of natural justice violated due to lack of proper communication regarding show cause notice and order, leading to tax demand confirmation without petitioner's...

  4. Cancellation of registration of petitioner - The High court concluded that the cancellation order lacked reasoning and application of mind, violating the petitioner's...

  5. Violation of principles of natural justice - petitioner was not provided with an adequate opportunity to defend SCN - The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of the...

  6. The High Court considered a case regarding refund of Input Tax Credit. The petitioner's refund application was rejected due to lack of supporting documents. The...

  7. Petitioner challenged adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 regarding discrepancies in returns, short payment of tax, and excess availment of Input Tax...

  8. Validity of provisional attachment order - benefit of Input Tax Credit availed from invoices issued from non-existing firms - It observes that the impugned order lacks...

  9. Recovery of tax arrears from the Former director of the Company - Attachment of Bank accounts - DIN of the petitioner got disqualified under Section 164(2)(a) of the...

  10. Assessment orders quashed due to petitioner's illness, remanded for fresh orders. Petitioner directed to file consolidated reply within 30 days. Cases remitted to...

  11. Judicial review of an assessment order was conducted due to discrepancies between GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B returns. The petitioner's replies were not considered, violating...

  12. The High Court held that the show cause notice (SCN) issued for cancellation of the petitioner's Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration was vague and violated...

  13. SCN does not clearly reflect reasons for proposed cancellation of petitioner's GST registration, violating principles of natural justice. Show cause notice must specify...

  14. The High Court found that the respondents failed to properly consider the petitioner's contentions regarding the retrospective cancellation of GST registration of its...

  15. Recovery notice - Validity of assessment orders - The High court observed that while personal hearings were offered to the petitioner, it was evident that the petitioner...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates