Court directs petitioner to submit composite reply to show cause ...

Petitioner gets 2 weeks to reply, respondents 6 weeks to pass reasoned order after hearing; order communicated in 2 weeks.

Case Laws GST

September 9, 2024

Court directs petitioner to submit composite reply to show cause notice within two weeks. Respondents to provide opportunity of hearing to petitioner and pass reasoned order within six weeks of receiving reply. Order to be communicated to petitioner within two weeks thereafter. Court refrains from examining merits, petitioner free to raise points before respondents. Petition disposed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Court directs petitioner to submit composite reply to show cause ...

Petitioner gets 2 weeks to reply, respondents 6 weeks to pass reasoned order after hearing; order communicated in 2 weeks.

Case Laws GST

September 9, 2024

You may also like:

Jurisdiction challenge to assessment orders passed by different officer from investigating officer. Petitioner negligent in non-participation in proceedings emanating...

Procedure for assessment - scope of e-Assessment Scheme - A link for personal hearing shall be sent to the petitioner and the petitioner shall be heard within a period...

Order passed before the time prescribed for filing the reply - Validity of assessment - violation of principles of natural justice - faceless assessment scheme - The...

Validity of summons issued u/s 70 - Proper officer - The High court examined Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act and determined that its scope differed from that of Section...

Admission of claims by Liquidator - Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 are not getting any double benefit on the other hand they are loosing part of the claim even after admission...

Petitioner challenged notices issued in Form GST MOV-01 and MOV-07 for not generating e-invoices during transfer of PETN explosives. Court held that petitioner undertook...

Validity of summon order - Competent officer / authority u/s 6(2)(b) of CGST Act 2017 - Jurisdiction - The investigations being conducted by competent Officers against...

Validity of Tax demand - Non consideration of reply submitted by the petitioner / assessee - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's contentions. It quashed the...

Reopening notice u/s 148A(b) - validity of order passed u/s 148A(d) and u/s 148 - HC set aside the notice u/s 148 and order u/s 148(b) and directed AO to furnish the...

Inquiry proceedings under Service Tax - apprehension of arrest - The summons issued to the petitioners / petitioner No.2, does not authorize the investigating officer to...

The High Court considered the validity of an assessment order u/s 143(3) r/w sec 144B, focusing on the alleged violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner...

Order passed before the time prescribed for filing the reply - faceless assessment scheme - it is evident that the impugned order has been passed with pre-set mind. In...

Interest on refund due to error on the part of officer - As the amount of interest is being paid out of public exchequer, the Chief Principal Commissioner in-charge of...

Assessment orders quashed due to petitioner's illness, remanded for fresh orders. Petitioner directed to file consolidated reply within 30 days. Cases remitted to...

Availment of CENVAT Credit - Non maintenance of separate account - When it is impossible to comply with the provisions of sub-rule (2) of Rule 6, it would not be...

Quick Updates: