Court directs petitioner to submit composite reply to show cause ...

Petitioner gets 2 weeks to reply, respondents 6 weeks to pass reasoned order after hearing; order communicated in 2 weeks.

Case Laws GST

September 9, 2024

Court directs petitioner to submit composite reply to show cause notice within two weeks. Respondents to provide opportunity of hearing to petitioner and pass reasoned order within six weeks of receiving reply. Order to be communicated to petitioner within two weeks thereafter. Court refrains from examining merits, petitioner free to raise points before respondents. Petition disposed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Court directs petitioner to submit composite reply to show cause ...

Petitioner gets 2 weeks to reply, respondents 6 weeks to pass reasoned order after hearing; order communicated in 2 weeks.

Case Laws GST

September 9, 2024

You may also like:

Jurisdiction challenge to assessment orders passed by different officer from investigating officer. Petitioner negligent in non-participation in proceedings emanating...

Procedure for assessment - scope of e-Assessment Scheme - A link for personal hearing shall be sent to the petitioner and the petitioner shall be heard within a period...

Order passed before the time prescribed for filing the reply - Validity of assessment - violation of principles of natural justice - faceless assessment scheme - The...

The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

Validity of summons issued u/s 70 - Proper officer - The High court examined Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act and determined that its scope differed from that of Section...

Admission of claims by Liquidator - Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 are not getting any double benefit on the other hand they are loosing part of the claim even after admission...

Validity of summon order - Competent officer / authority u/s 6(2)(b) of CGST Act 2017 - Jurisdiction - The investigations being conducted by competent Officers against...

Petitioner challenged notices issued in Form GST MOV-01 and MOV-07 for not generating e-invoices during transfer of PETN explosives. Court held that petitioner undertook...

Validity of Tax demand - Non consideration of reply submitted by the petitioner / assessee - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's contentions. It quashed the...

Inquiry proceedings under Service Tax - apprehension of arrest - The summons issued to the petitioners / petitioner No.2, does not authorize the investigating officer to...

Petitioner challenged order u/s 73 of GST Act creating demand, as notices were uploaded on GST portal's 'Additional Notices and Orders' tab, unbeknownst to petitioner...

The High Court considered the validity of an assessment order u/s 143(3) r/w sec 144B, focusing on the alleged violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner...

Reopening notice u/s 148A(b) - validity of order passed u/s 148A(d) and u/s 148 - HC set aside the notice u/s 148 and order u/s 148(b) and directed AO to furnish the...

The High Court set aside the impugned order dated 18.04.2024 passed by the 1st Respondent due to violation of principles of natural justice. The Petitioner was not aware...

Order passed before the time prescribed for filing the reply - faceless assessment scheme - it is evident that the impugned order has been passed with pre-set mind. In...

Quick Updates: