Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court held that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer ...


Non-compliance with faceless assessment regime vitiates reassessment proceedings.

Case Laws     Income Tax

September 17, 2024

The High Court held that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) is not permitted to issue a notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, as it would amount to a breach of the provisions of Section 151A, which has brought a regime of faceless assessment. As per the decision in Hexaware Technology Ltd., the provisions of Section 151A clearly mandate faceless assessment. There is no concurrent jurisdiction of the JAO and the Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) for issuance of notice u/s 148 or passing assessment/reassessment orders. When specific jurisdiction has been assigned to either the JAO or the FAO under the Scheme dated 29th March 2022, it is to the exclusion of the other. Accepting the Revenue's argument would lead to chaos and render the faceless proceedings redundant. In the present case, the Revenue has not complied with the Scheme notified u/s 151A(2), which governs the conduct of proceedings u/ss 148A and 148. The explicit declaration of the law in Hexaware renders the grievance of the Assessee sustainable, and the manner of initiating proceedings vitiates the proceedings.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Validity of Reopening of assessment - proceedings drawn u/s 148A commenced by the local jurisdictional officer - non adherence to procedure of faceless regime for the...

  2. Faceless assessment regime mandated u/s 151A - Jurisdictional Assessing Officer not permitted to issue notice u/s 148, as it would breach Section 151A provisions - No...

  3. Faceless Assessment Unit passed assessment order beyond seven days from show-cause issuance, violating natural justice principles. Submit Response Button deactivation...

  4. Notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) are invalid and bad-in-law u/s 151A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue...

  5. The High Court held that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) is not permitted to issue a notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, as it would violate the provisions...

  6. This case deals with the validity of a notice issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) in light of the provisions of Section...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

  8. Validity of National Faceless Assessment orders - Both the Assessees and the Assessing Officers are under tremendous pressure to meet deadlines as the Show Cause Notices...

  9. Faceless assessment regime introduced new procedures codified u/s 144B for assessments u/ss 143(3), 144, and 147, while assessments u/s 144C (transfer pricing cases)...

  10. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - unexplained cash payment - Two notices issued u/s 148 - it is a case where pending conclusion of the first reassessment proceedings,...

  11. Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless...

  12. Validity of reopening income tax assessment proceedings. The key points are: the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) issued the notice for reopening assessment...

  13. The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) due to the Accountant's Covid-19...

  14. Faceless Assessment Unit failed to offer personal hearing opportunity through video conferencing despite petitioner's request as mandated u/s 144B(6)(viii). Petitioner's...

  15. Faceless Assessment u/s 144B - Personal opportunity of hearing was not granted to the petitioner, we do not find any good reason to grant any time to file...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates