The Karnataka High Court disposed of the petition challenging ...

Upholding tax provisions, Court grants opportunity to be heard.

Case Laws GST

November 14, 2024

The Karnataka High Court disposed of the petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 16(4) of the CGST and KGST Act, 2017, which was alleged to be violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 300A of the Constitution. The Court relied on its previous judgment in M/s. Sadhana Enviro Engineering Services vs. Joint Commissioner of Central Tax & others, where it held that in view of the amendment inserting Section 16(5), the petitioner should be given a reasonable opportunity and heard by the original authority, which should then proceed in accordance with law. Consequently, the present petition was allowed and disposed of in terms of the earlier judgment, directing the authorities to implement the provisions after granting a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Karnataka High Court disposed of the petition challenging ...

Upholding tax provisions, Court grants opportunity to be heard.

Case Laws GST

November 14, 2024

You may also like:

The case pertains to a violation of the principles of natural justice, wherein the petitioner's right to an opportunity for personal hearing, as provided under the law,...

Recovery notices and bank attachment orders - No opportunity of being heard - discrepancies between the GSTR 3B return and the GSTR 2B return - The High Court observed...

The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

The High Court found a violation of the principles of natural justice due to the Assessing Authority's denial of an oral hearing opportunity. The court held that even if...

Petitioner challenged validity of Assessment Order under Income Tax Act on grounds of breach of principles of natural justice and denial of opportunity for personal...

Determination of tax u/s 73(9) of the CGST/SGST Act - petitioner submits that the order is passed merely on the representation of the petitioner without giving any...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - denial of natural justice - order passed under Section 148A(d) - The legal principle that can be culled out from the aforementioned...

Validity of order for levy of penalty - Principles of natural justice - The provision, that is, Section 75(4) of the Act, has mandated that, only an opportunity of...

Effective opportunity - Courts have consistently interpreted the phrase 'effective opportunity' to mean and include an opportunity of personal hearing as well. In this...

The court held that u/s 75(4) of the GST Act, an opportunity for personal hearing must be granted if requested in writing by the person liable for tax or penalty, or if...

Order set aside for violation of principles of natural justice by denying petitioner opportunity of oral hearing before passing adverse assessment order raising excess...

Rejection of refund claim - opportunity of hearing not provided - As per Rule 92 (3) of CGST Rules, 2017, the provision is very clear that any application for refund...

Opportunity of personal hearing is mandatory u/s 75(4) of the CGST/UPGST Act 2017 or not - where an adverse decision is contemplated against the person, such a person...

Service of Demand Notice - Detention/Confiscation of goods - opportunity of being heard is to be given to both the owner of the goods as also the owner of the conveyance....

Compulsory audit u/s 142(2A) - Though the impugned action is questioned on the ground that effective opportunity of hearing was not given. However, the record reveals...

Quick Updates: