Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2024 Year 2024 This

The appellant, a decree holder, qualifies as a "Financial ...


Decree holder's financial claim recognized under IBC despite settlement; limitation extended by acknowledgment.

December 19, 2024

Case Laws     IBC     AT

The appellant, a decree holder, qualifies as a "Financial Creditor" under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The settlement agreement recognized the appellant's financial claim, and the decree formalized the respondent's obligation to pay, not altering the underlying financial debt's character. The petition filed by the appellant u/s 7 of the IBC is within the limitation period. The respondent's acknowledgments of debt before the High Court extended the limitation period u/s 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The NCLT order dismissing the petition on the ground of limitation is erroneous and liable to be set aside. The appeal is allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Initiation of CIRP - Decree Holder - Financial Creditor - the debt in this case arising out of a decree, is a Financial Debt. - Section 3(11) of the Code defines debt as...

  2. Initiation of CIRP - period of limitation - whether the issuance of Recovery Certificate would not trigger the right to sue. - A liability in respect of a claim arising...

  3. Corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) - claims filed under a CIRP by "decree holder" - Once admitted as a creditor, the efforts must be to preserve and maximise...

  4. The High Court ruled that security interests over assets of a corporate debtor to secure amounts due under a judgment or decree must give way to the provisions of the...

  5. Rejection of Section 7 Application filed by the Appellant (homebuyers) on the ground of non-compliance of Section 7, sub-section (1), 2nd Proviso - decree-holder is...

  6. Initiation of CIRP - Financial creditor within the meaning of sub-section (7) of Section 5 of the IBC - The Supreme Court affirmed the NCLAT’s judgment, holding that the...

  7. Initiation of CIRP - Period of limitation - to be recognized from the date of NPA or Balance Sheet recognizing the debt - An application under Section 7 of the IBC would...

  8. Initiation of CIRP - Financial Debt or not - It is clear that the amount provided by PEC as financial assistance, and claimed by it as financial debt under IBC, is...

  9. Initiation of CIRP - Period of limitation - It cannot be gainsaid that the Respondent/Financial Creditor, after considering the proposal of the Appellant for ‘One Time...

  10. Maintainability of application u/s 7 - time limitation - The Appellate Tribunal referenced recent Supreme Court judgments, affirming that a liability arising from a...

  11. CIRP - Financial Creditor - decree holder come within the definition of Financial Creditor or not - The Adjudicating Authority has erred grossly by not considering that...

  12. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that the Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor was not barred by Section 10A of the Insolvency and...

  13. Maintainability of petition seeking initiation of CIRP against Personal Guarantor/Respondent - invocation of Bank guarantee and time limitation - The case involved an...

  14. Validity of Settlement Commission orders - The case involved petitions seeking directives for the issuance of formal orders under section 245D (4) of the Income Tax Act,...

  15. The period of limitation of one year does not apply when the amount claimed as refund has been paid under protest. Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962, only recognizes...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates