Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2025 Year 2025 This

Appellant is not a Governmental Authority exempted under ...


Appellant Taxed for Renting Property & Services; Penalties u/s 77 Upheld; Section 78 Dismissed; CESTAT Partially Allows Appeal.

January 10, 2025

Case Laws     Service Tax     AT

Appellant is not a Governmental Authority exempted under Notification No. 25/2012-ST. Renting of immovable property and Mandap Keeper services provided by Appellant are taxable. Show cause notice was not vague. Appellant failed to prove community centres were given for religious activities. Appellant is neither a Government nor local authority. Extended period of limitation correctly invoked. Penalties u/s 78 set aside, but upheld u/s 77 for non-registration and non-filing of returns. Appeal allowed in part by CESTAT.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

  2. CESTAT upheld the levy of service tax on renting of immovable property, rejecting appellant's contention that such activity cannot be considered a service. The Tribunal...

  3. Levy of service tax - Life Insurance Service - Renting of Immovable Property Service or not - On the taxability of life insurance service, the Tribunal determined that...

  4. The case pertains to the levy of service tax under the reverse charge mechanism (RCM) on rental payments made by a company to its directors for renting immovable...

  5. Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

  6. The CESTAT dismissed the appellant's challenge to service tax levied on one-time premium collected for renting immovable property. Following the Allahabad HC decision in...

  7. CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding service tax liability on GTA services during 2008-2013. The Tribunal determined service tax liability shifted to service...

  8. Renting of immovable property service - Liability of Appellant (Partnership Firm) is liable to discharge service tax on property jointly owned by parents of the...

  9. Renting of immovable property service - The appellant entered into agreements with the film distributors under which the film distributors granted copyright license in...

  10. Levy of Service Tax - liquidated damages received - The demand of service tax on late payment surcharge meter renting charges and supervision charges are set aside. The...

  11. Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - evasion of service tax - appellant collected service tax from the service receivers but failed to deposit the...

  12. Appellant registered for providing cab operator's service rented vehicles to clients for transporting their employees, charges levied on kilometer basis inclusive of...

  13. Classification of services - renting of immovable property service or Support Services of Business and Commerce - assessee has rendered composite services whereas as per...

  14. CESTAT ruled that service tax demands for rent-a-cab, tour operator, and business auxiliary services cannot be extended beyond normal limitation period due to absence of...

  15. Levy of service tax - renting of immovable property Service - charitable institution - If the petitioner felt that it was not liable to pay tax for renting of its...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates