Petitioner contested order regarding deficient monthly returns ...

Tax Authority Must Allow Taxpayer Final Hearing Before Assessment After 25% Payment Commitment Under GST Law

February 11, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

Petitioner contested order regarding deficient monthly returns and lack of supporting documentation. Following precedent in K. Balakrishnan case, HC set aside the impugned order. Petitioner demonstrated willingness to pay 25% of disputed tax amount and requested final opportunity for presenting objections before adjudicating authority. Government Pleader raised no substantial opposition. HC disposed of writ petition by setting aside original order, allowing petitioner to present case before adjudicating authority with commitment to partial tax payment, aligning with established GST procedural jurisprudence on opportunities for taxpayer representation.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Petitioner contested order regarding deficient monthly returns ...

Tax Authority Must Allow Taxpayer Final Hearing Before Assessment After 25% Payment Commitment Under GST Law

February 11, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Prior to 25-6-1999 the adjudicating authority could adjust the excess payments made at the time of provisional assessment towards short-payments arising at the time of...

Tax authority rejected rectification application filed by taxpayer for zero-rated supply citing violation of principles of natural justice. Court examined impugned...

Withdrawing the excess tax credit for advance tax and self-assessment tax - Rectification u/s 154 - The assessee has to furnish details of different payments of tax by...

The High Court examined the challenge to the assessment and demand orders, validity of the show cause notice (SCN), discrepancy in the assessment amount compared to the...

The key points covered in the legal document are: 1. It introduces new forms (GST SPL-01 to GST SPL-08) for taxpayers to apply for waiver of interest and penalty u/s...

Interest on delayed payment of GST - CBIC has clarified that the Notification No. 63/2020-Central Tax dated 25th August 2020 relating to interest on delayed payment of...

The High Court addressed the issue of parallel proceedings initiated by both State and Central GST Authorities against the petitioner for the same assessment years. For...

MEANING AND SCOPE OF ‘SUPPLY’ UNDER MODEL GST LAW - Goods and Services Tax - GST

Petitioner challenged validity of Assessment Order under Income Tax Act on grounds of breach of principles of natural justice and denial of opportunity for personal...

Rectification of mistakenly declared value at the time of filing bill of entry was sought through amendment due to omission by supplier/appellant during import. Section...

Seeking service tax refund for payment of VAT liability - he petitioner had made the payment of the service tax for the periods in question voluntarily and had never...

GST Authorities invoked penal provisions under Indian Penal Code against the petitioner without invoking penal provisions of GST Act, despite the alleged offences being...

The High Court held that petitioners are entitled to pay 10% of the disputed GST amount as a pre-condition for filing an appeal by debiting the amount available in the...

The petitioner challenged orders u/s 62 of the TNGST Act for failing to furnish returns from April to July 2023 within the prescribed period. The High Court held that...

Rejection of refund claim - finalization of provisional assessment or not - A provisional assessment will always remain as a provisional one. There is no shortcut as a...

Quick Updates: