Clandestine removal - The denial of cross-examination tantamount ...

No Cross-Examination in Clandestine Removal Cases Violates Natural Justice and Due Process in Excise and Tax Disputes.

November 24, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Clandestine removal - The denial of cross-examination tantamount to violation of natural justice. The demand has wholly been raised, on the basis of the statements recorded. In such cases, the denial of cross-examination is fatal to the proceedings.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal - The denial of cross-examination tantamount ...

No Cross-Examination in Clandestine Removal Cases Violates Natural Justice and Due Process in Excise and Tax Disputes.

November 24, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Clandestine Removal - As per the provisions of section 9D it is clear that during adjudication, the adjudicating authority is required to first examine the witness in...

Clandestine removal demand based on electrical consumption was challenged. Average electricity consumption for certain periods was calculated. Cross-examination of...

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the impugned order and remanded the cases back to the adjudicating authority. The appellants...

Allegations of clandestine removal of polished vitrified tiles and evasion of duty were primarily based on private documents/records recovered from premises of M/s K.N....

Violation of principles of natural justice - From the statutory provision of section 138 B, it is not the option for the Adjudicating Authority to allow or not to allow...

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the rejection of the petitioner's request for cross-examination in a matter...

Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

Clandestine removal of excisable goods alleged based on statements recorded from partners, employees, and buyers. Section 9D of Central Excise Act mandates...

Clandestine removal - The cross examination of tempo driver was already allowed earlier and therefore there was no reason for the adjudicating authority to grant cross...

Clandestine removal of goods - the cross-examination of person from whose premises these documents had been recovered was necessary, more so when the same had been...

Clandestine removal - consumption of electricity - the charge of clandestine removal is to be established on examination of facts of each case and not merely on the...

The case pertains to the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of structural items/rolled products by the appellant. The revenue's case rested solely on...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty imposition u/s 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 due to failure to allow cross-examination of panchas and experts,...

Principles of natural justice - rejection of cross-examination - The petitioner has approached this Court prematurely as the respondents have only rejected the request...

Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did...

Quick Updates: