Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2025 Year 2025 This

Reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147 were quashed by ITAT ...


Unexplained investment addition quashed due to lack of cross-examination opportunity on relied statements.

January 6, 2025

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147 were quashed by ITAT for violation of principles of natural justice due to lack of opportunity for cross-examination of statements relied upon for making unexplained investment addition u/s 69. ITAT held that assessee must be provided materials/statements used against them and given adequate opportunity to explain. Mere retraction statements obtained later cannot cure initial violation. AO failed to conduct further enquiries to unearth circumstantial evidence supporting impugned statements. Reassessment order passed in violation of natural justice, assessee's appeal allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The ITAT Indore addressed unexplained cash investment for property purchase post search operation. Addition without cross-examination was challenged. The Tribunal...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

  3. Addition on account of unexplained source of investment - seller declared higher price of sales value - cross examination - when the statement of the seller is solely...

  4. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the assessee company. The assessee had furnished all relevant documents and evidence to...

  5. The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the impugned order and remanded the cases back to the adjudicating authority. The appellants...

  6. Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

  7. The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the rejection of the petitioner's request for cross-examination in a matter...

  8. Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

  9. Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

  10. Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did...

  11. Unexplained cash payment made by the assessee relating to the admission of his son into P.G. medical course under management quota - the addition is based on the...

  12. Unexplained investment - addition made on the basis of statements of third parties - no addition can be sustained on the basis of such oral admission of interested party...

  13. Clandestine removal demand based on electrical consumption was challenged. Average electricity consumption for certain periods was calculated. Cross-examination of...

  14. Misdeclaration of description and value - Validity of test report - Cross examination of Chemical Examiner - In the present matter, refusal to allow cross-examination of...

  15. Clandestine removal - denial of opportunity of cross-examination of witnesses - The only question is at what stage would he be entitled to cross-examine the witnesses -...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates