Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2011 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (7) TMI 429 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
1. Extension of cum duty benefit challenge by Revenue
2. Classification challenge by assessees regarding "Wind Shield Wiper Motor" and "Blower Motor"

Extension of Cum Duty Benefit Challenge:
The judgment addresses the Revenue's appeal challenging the extension of cum duty benefit in light of a Larger Bench decision in Sri Chakra Tyres. The Revenue's sole ground is the department's review petition against the apex court's decision in Collector Vs. Srichakra Tyres, which was dismissed by the apex court. The tribunal finds no merit in the Revenue's objection and upholds the impugned order regarding the re-determination of value based on the Srichakra Tyres decision. This issue is resolved in favor of the assessees.

Classification Challenge - Wind Shield Wiper Motor and Blower Motor:
Regarding the classification challenge raised by the assessees, the tribunal analyzes the nature of the Wind Shield Wiper Motor and the Blower Motor. The Wind Shield Wiper Motor, comprising a motor with a gear assembly meant to be a part of the windscreen wiper, and the Blower Motor, designed for air circulation inside or outside the car, are not considered simple prime movers justifying classification under Chapter Heading 85.01. Applying Note 2(b) of Section XVI, the tribunal determines that both motors fall under Chapter Heading 85.12 as parts of a windscreen wiper and under Chapter sub-heading 8543.90 as goods not elsewhere specified, respectively. The classification adopted by the authorities below is upheld, and the cross appeal by the assessees is dismissed. Thus, this issue is resolved against the assessees.

In conclusion, the judgment dismisses both the Revenue's appeal challenging the cum duty benefit extension and the assessees' cross appeal regarding the classification of the Wind Shield Wiper Motor and Blower Motor. The decision provides detailed reasoning for upholding the impugned order based on the relevant legal provisions and precedents cited during the proceedings.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates