Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2021 (3) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (3) TMI 974 - HC - Indian Laws


Issues:
Accusations under Sections 22(C), 23(C) & 29 NDPS Act, Bail Application Dismissal, Retraction of Confessional Statement, Conditions under Section 37 of NDPS Act, Presumption under Section 35 of NDPS Act.

Accusations under Sections 22(C), 23(C) & 29 NDPS Act:
The petitioner was accused of offenses under the NDPS Act based on the recovery of Amphetamine from a parcel. Statements of co-accused indicated the petitioner's involvement in accepting international parcels. The trial court dismissed the bail application citing a prima facie case against the petitioner.

Bail Application Dismissal:
The petitioner filed a petition claiming innocence and false implication. The trial court dismissed the bail application considering the involvement of the petitioner in sending parcels containing contraband. The petitioner argued that he was on leave when the parcel was booked and that his identification documents were misused. Legal precedents were cited to support the petitioner's case.

Retraction of Confessional Statement:
The petitioner retracted his confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of NDPS Act. The Supreme Court's view on the evidentiary value of such statements was discussed, highlighting the need for its proof during trial. Lack of other evidence implicating the petitioner was noted.

Conditions under Section 37 of NDPS Act:
The petitioner claimed to fulfill the conditions under Section 37 of NDPS Act as no recovery was made from him, and he was not in contact with the main accused. The court found merit in the petitioner's argument and concluded that the requirements under Section 37 were met, allowing for the possibility of bail.

Presumption under Section 35 of NDPS Act:
The prosecution raised the plea of presumption under Section 35 of NDPS Act, which places the burden of proof on the accused regarding culpable mental state. Legal precedents were cited to explain the burden of proof and the standards required for proving guilt or innocence. The court emphasized the need for strict compliance with procedural requirements.

In conclusion, the court allowed the petition, directing the petitioner's release on bail while imposing conditions to prevent tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. The decision was made based on the petitioner's fulfillment of conditions under Section 37 of NDPS Act and the legal interpretations regarding confessional statements and presumptions under the NDPS Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates