9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (5) TMI 146X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er]. - This appeal is against a penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 114(iii) of the Customs Act. The appellant was an employee of M/s. V.V. Enterprises and, in that capacity, he was working as Data Entry Operator of M/s. Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation at Trans India Logistics Park, Customs Freight Station (CFS) located at Nhava Sheva during the material period. The Central In ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r the export goods covered under the above mentioned 13 shipping bills having declared FOB value of Rs. 3,39,19,041/- be re-determined at Rs. 11,51,468/-. 2. I order the confiscation of goods covered under the above mentioned 13 shipping bills with a re-determined FOB value of Rs. 11,51,468/- under Section 113(d), (h) and (i) of the Customs Act, 1962, read with provisions of Section 11 of F ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e kept in abeyance against them. However, penal action will be initiated against them as and when they are traced out. 5. The penal action against Shri Sanjiv Arora, who played a crucial role in the fraudulent exports, cannot be taken at this stage as he could be traced out. The same are kept in abeyance against them. However, penal action will be initiated against them as and when they are trace ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pears from the records that the show-cause notice alleged that M/s. Shiv Shakti Overseas (exporter), by their commissions or omissions, rendered the export goods liable to confiscation under Section 113 of the Act. It further alleged that the appellant and others abetted the offence committed by the exporter, thereby rendering the goods liable to confiscation under Section 113 and rendering themse ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
