2005 (7) TMI 505

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for the Respondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. In this appeal the appellants have contested the correctness of the impugned Order-in-Appeal under which the Commissioner (Appeals) has confirmed the confiscation of the branded goods and imposition of redemption fine and penalty as detailed in the Order-in-Original of the adjudicating authority. 2. Learned Counsel has contende .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... but so far the same had not been accorded to them. Having used the brand names of other persons without getting the licence/registration from the Central Excise, the appellants have rendered themselves liable for penal action. Their branded goods have been rightly confiscated and redemption fine and penalty imposed on them are quite reasonable. We do not find any illegality in the impugned order a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X