2011 (3) TMI 842

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sp; Per : Mrs. Archana Wadhwa;   After dispensing with condition of pre-deposit of penalty amount of Rs. 2000/- and interest of Rs. 5,166/-, I proceed to decide the appeal itself, inasmuch as the issue involved is covered by the precedent decision of the Tribunal.   2. The appellants cleared certain inputs and capital goods as such. The duty required to be paid on such removal was not .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ortnightly facility for payment is also available for removal of inputs and capital goods from the factory and is not limited to final products. To the same effect is the another decision of the Tribunal in the case of CCE Raigad vs. Savita Polymers Limited 2007 (208) ELT 200 (Tri. Mumbai). In fact subsequent proceedings initiated on the same ground against the appellants stand dropped by their Su .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X