9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (1) TMI 981X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Gaurav Mehta for the Operational Creditor Learned Counsel Mr. Rishi Malik for the Corporate Debtor ORDER This application has been filed by M/s. Raghuvanshi Refractories Operational Creditor to initiate CIRP against M/s. Desai Impex Pvt. Ltd. being Corporate Debtor. The outstanding sum has been claimed at Rs. 11,30,146/- and date of default has been claimed as Financial Year 2018. 2.&nb ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of Corporate Debtor made strong plea that dismissal of this application surely on the ground that so-called demand notice was not demand notice as this was not on the format prescribed under Section 8(1) of IBC, 2016 r.w Regulation 5 of (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016. It was further contended that even person who signed the application was not having requisi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of proceedings under Section 9 of IBC, 2016 or section 8 of IBC 2016 of significant nature. It has been observed by higher judicial forums that requirement of service of notice under Section 8(1) of IBC, 2016 is crucial so that any entity is not put into CIRP in a light manner. Rule 5 (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 provides that Operational Creditor "shall" delive ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nder Section 9 was liable to be dismissed. As stated earlier, neither specified form has been delivered nor contents of such notice meet the requirements of law. In this view of the matter, we are of the considered view that present application is liable to be dismissed as it is an incurable defect. Accordingly, the application filed by the Operational Creditor stands dismissed and dis ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
